|
Posted by ITIL Prime on January 10, 2008, 12:03 pm
Please log in for more thread options On Jan 10, 10:57 am, "Paul Thomas, CPA"
>
>
>
> > On Jan 10, 10:13 am, "Paul Thomas, CPA"
>
> >> Actually, since they are paying their half of the employment taxes (and
> >> they
> >> may have other benefits for you being an employee) you should be getting
> >> less than when you bill them as self-employed (even if you bill through
> >> your
> >> company).
>
> >> I trust you were doing some kind of payroll/wages from your company to
> >> yourself, and that all payroll related taxes and forms/reports were or
> >> will
> >> be filed.
>
> >> There's no tax downside to you.
>
> >> You would want to be sure that as their employee - you aren't violating
> >> some
> >> company policy of working what would be considered "for the competition"
> >> when you do the same work for others. And your other clients might also
> >> want to know that you are employed by another company. I think that some
> >> open discussion and disclosure would resolve many future issues or
> >> problems.
>
> > No benefits are included (I still pay healthcare, etc). I was
> > concerned about the amount of deductions I currently claim for my S-
> > Corp (auto expenses, healthcare, etc), and if that might change by
> > accepting W2-hourly. I suppose it wouldn't as I will still be
> > collecting invoices to the S-Corp for other work. But if my only
> > source of income becomes the W2-hourly, will I be precluded from
> > deducting those expenses?
>
> The company can't deduct health insurance as it stands now.
>
> Your mileage to and from that place of employment isn't "business" related,
> so that is the only issue that I see.
>
> --
> Paul A. Thomas, CPA
> Athens, Georgia
Got it- thanks.
|