Home Page link  

US-Gaap Question in regards to software companies

 

General Accounting - General Accounting Discussions

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
US-Gaap Question in regards to software companies Hugo 01-16-2008
Posted by Hugo on January 16, 2008, 4:15 am
Please log in for more thread options
Hi,

I hardly know much about US-GAAP, so please bear with me in case the
question is too easy.

I'm working for a software company reporting in US-GAAP. The last times I
hear the the following statements quite often:

1.
If version 2 of our software had that feature, we can't drop it in version 3
(even though no one uses that features) because of US-GAAP.

2.
If we want to test our new features at a customer we have to call it a pilot
if the product is completely new. A beta shipment if it extens some
existing software. You guess it - because of US-GAAP.

Is something like this really described in US-GAAP? Does US-GAAP have
specific requirements for different industries? Like here software
industry? Where is US-GAAP described (for the software industry)?

Thanks!

KH

Posted by John on January 16, 2008, 7:53 am
Please log in for more thread options
> Hi,
>
> I hardly know much about US-GAAP, so please bear with me in case the
> question is too easy.
>
> I'm working for a software company reporting in US-GAAP. The last times I
> hear the the following statements quite often:
>
> 1.
> If version 2 of our software had that feature, we can't drop it in version 3
> (even though no one uses that features) because of US-GAAP.
>
> 2.
> If we want to test our new features at a customer we have to call it a pilot
> if the product is completely new. A beta shipment if it extens some
> existing software. You guess it - because of US-GAAP.
>
> Is something like this really described in US-GAAP? Does US-GAAP have
> specific requirements for different industries? Like here software
> industry? Where is US-GAAP described (for the software industry)?
>
> Thanks!
>
> KH


you don't specify the type of software but in general, US GAAP
"generally accepted accounting principles" does not address different
industry standards or software functions. There is not a "GAAP" for
the software industry, only general accounting principles for
recording financial transactions. But there are industry guides
published by the AICPA for auditors and there are "ISO" guidelines
that address some types of software.








Posted by Paul Thomas, CPA on January 16, 2008, 8:11 am
Please log in for more thread options

> I hardly know much about US-GAAP, so please
> bear with me in case the question is too easy.
>
> I'm working for a software company reporting in US-GAAP.
> The last times I hear the the following statements quite often:
>
> 1.
> If version 2 of our software had that feature, we can't drop it in version
> 3
> (even though no one uses that features) because of US-GAAP.
>
> 2.
> If we want to test our new features at a customer we have to call it a
> pilot
> if the product is completely new. A beta shipment if it extens some
> existing software. You guess it - because of US-GAAP.
>
> Is something like this really described in US-GAAP? Does US-GAAP have
> specific requirements for different industries? Like here software
> industry? Where is US-GAAP described (for the software industry)?




It probably has to do something with GAAP rules about capitalizing of the
expenses. Some of what you are questioning might be R&D expenses. GAAP
addresses when something has to be capitalized, and that's probably what
their concern is all about - although GAAP shouldn't drive advances or
improvements in the business. You make those moves because it's good for
the software, which is good for the customers, which is good for the
business, which is good for the shareholders.





--
Paul A. Thomas, CPA
Athens, Georgia







Similar ThreadsPosted
OT: Dodgy UK recruitment companies April 20, 2007, 4:59 am
Aren't all credit repair companies scams? January 22, 2007, 2:22 pm
Why don't all companies issue non-voting shares? December 15, 2007, 11:56 am
Team Mgr, Adviser Marketing, Capital Group Companies. March 24, 2008, 1:16 am
Global Securities Associate - Pricing, Capital Group Companies. March 24, 2008, 1:14 am
Re: Which Tax Software should I use? January 17, 2007, 6:18 pm
Software audit January 24, 2007, 9:32 pm
accounting software? February 16, 2007, 9:43 am
which invoicing software? April 13, 2007, 6:13 pm
account rec software September 17, 2007, 10:30 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap