|
Posted by George on May 24, 2007, 11:28 am
Please log in for more thread options Originally that is what I thought. Here is what I did. Set all registers to
not use any receipt format and deleted all receipt formats. Queried the
database and verified that the data was gone. I then copied the default
receipt.xml that comes with RMS to the proper folder. I go into RMS manager
and create a receipt format and configure the register to use this. The
preview then displays multipal payments.
I repeat the above steps only useing a different database and the preview
displays only one payment in the preview.
"Jeff @ Check Point Software" wrote:
> George,
>
> Sounds like someone modified a receipt template. They are stored in the
database on a per register basis. You will need to find that receipt template
and use it for the register(s) you want. They are stored by default in;
> C:Program FilesMicrosoft Retail Management SystemStore
OperationsReceiptTemplates
>
> --
>
> Jeff
> Check Point Software
>
> =====================================================
>
> You must be using Outlook Express/Windows Mail or some other type of newsgroup
reader to
> see and download the file attachment(s). If you are not using a reader, follow
> the link below to setup Outlook Express. Click on "Open with newsreader"
> under the MS Retail Management System on the right.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/75bgz
> =====================================================
>
> This must be a program configuration option but here is what I am looking
> for. I have tested this with 2 different databases and get different
> results. On one I go into the receipt format and review the Payment
receipt.
> The preview shows just the most recent payment and totals. I will then
> restore a different database to the same system and have it use the same
.xml
> file for the payement receipt and now it show a history of the customers
> payments. The customer indicates that at one time it just printed the
single
> detail format and now it prints the multi detail format but wants to go back.
>
> Any ideas?
|