|
Posted by ozzie on October 3, 2005, 10:33 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Something strange here...I noticed that I had items on order. Where the
items not committed but otherwise on hand and the number of items ordered
(but not yet recieved) are greater than the reorder point, it wont generate
an order. But if I commit more items such that the number on order + number
on hand but not committed < reorder number, it will generate a purchase
order.
To me, this behaviour seems peculiar and inflexible. I would much rather
have more control over the inventory than that, rather than being tied down
to arbitary rules set by a third party.
"ozzie" wrote:
> ..but shouldn't.
>
> The problem is, an order is made up for a customer. They may order several
> items, but may not pick up their order for a week or two. But we have their
> order sitting there ready to go the moment they walk in the door. The
> problem is, even though these items are committed, they remain seen as stock
> on hand, and the reorder trigger doesn't seem to fire. Essentially, all the
> stock could be in made up orders with nothing left on the shelf, but the
> Purchase Order wont care as we have heaps of stock on hand! So far the only
> way I see around this is a lot of manual mucking about with order entries
> etc.
>
> Shouldn't we have the option to treat committed items as no longer being
> considered stock on hand? I would think this would be an easy modification
> to add in.
>
> ----------------
> This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
> suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
> Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
> link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
> click "I Agree" in the message pane.
>
>
http://www.microsoft.com/Businesssolutions/Community/NewsGroups/dgbrowser/en-us/default.mspx?mid=75fc34a9-d970-44c1-bb7f-72224ad92443&dg=microsoft.public.pos
|