Duplicated EDC Settlement and Multiple EDC Batch Numbers from the same Batch


Duplicated EDC Settlement and Multiple EDC Batch Numbers from the same Batch

Groups | Search | About

User Password

Lost Password?

Point-Of-Sale Software - - MS Point Of Sale software discussed here

get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed

add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content

add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content

add this group's latest topics to your Google content

Yahoo!

Google

Windows Live

del.icio.us digg

digg

Netscape

Subject

Author

Date

Duplicated EDC Settlement and Multiple EDC Batch Numbers from the same Batch

Alex

03-30-2007

RE: Duplicated EDC Settlement and Multiple EDC Bat...

Dan

03-30-2007

Re: Duplicated EDC Settlement and Multiple EDC Bat...

Alex

03-30-2007

Re: Duplicated EDC Settlement and Multiple EDC Bat...

Jeff @ Check Po...

03-31-2007

Re: Duplicated EDC Settlement and Multiple EDC Bat...

Alex

03-31-2007

Re: Duplicated EDC Settlement and Multiple EDC Bat...

Jeff @ Check Po...

04-03-2007

Re: Duplicated EDC Settlement and Multiple EDC Bat...

Alex

04-04-2007

Posted by Alex on March 30, 2007, 10:29 am

Please log in for more thread options

We had a problem in RMS 2.0 with our EDC batch Settling twice on two
different occasions last week. I know it's not possible to settle an EDC
batch after it has been settled already in RMS 2.0 but it happened. Has
anybody else experienced the same problem or could tell me how to avoid this
from happening again? We do have a stable reliable and redundant Internet
connections so I've ruled this out.

Also when we settle the EDC batch (every night) I get several EDC Batch
numbers within the same batch when looking at the EDC Report, even though
our CC processor only shows one batch. We usually have the same EDC batch
number for about 90-95% of our transactions and the remaining % divided over
two or 3 other EDC batch numbers even though we only batch once per day. Is
anybody else experiencing this or does anybody else know why this happens?

Posted by Dan [MSFT] on March 30, 2007, 4:32 pm

Please log in for more thread options

Just to be clear, it does not sound like you have transactions settleing
twice but you have multiple batch numbers with in one settlement request. If
this is correct the number of transactions per batch is configurable. The
default number of transactions with-in a batch is 100. You can change the
batch size in the Administrator configuration window in the EDC tab under
advanced options.

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

"Alex" wrote:

> We had a problem in RMS 2.0 with our EDC batch Settling twice on two

> different occasions last week. I know it's not possible to settle an EDC

> batch after it has been settled already in RMS 2.0 but it happened. Has

> anybody else experienced the same problem or could tell me how to avoid this

> from happening again? We do have a stable reliable and redundant Internet

> connections so I've ruled this out.

> Also when we settle the EDC batch (every night) I get several EDC Batch

> numbers within the same batch when looking at the EDC Report, even though

> our CC processor only shows one batch. We usually have the same EDC batch

> number for about 90-95% of our transactions and the remaining % divided over

> two or 3 other EDC batch numbers even though we only batch once per day. Is

> anybody else experiencing this or does anybody else know why this happens?

Posted by Alex on March 30, 2007, 6:13 pm

Please log in for more thread options

As mentioned in my original post we have two issues/problems.

The duplicated EDC Settlement has turned out, after tedious investigating
and numerous phone call to our processor as well as Vital Support, to be a
Vital glitch. It was caused by a Vital upgrade (on their end) and has
affected some merchants, but has since been corrected.

This still leaves me with the issue of multiple EDC batch numbers as stated
in my original post. From day 1 I've had the batch size set to the maximum
(9999) so this shouldn't be the reason for 3 or 4 EDC batch numbers per
"batch". What else could cause each batch to have several batch numbers? We
usually have less than 180 or so transactions per daily batch.

What are the disadvantages of setting the batch size to 9999? Why does it
default to 100? And what are the advantages and disadvantages of leaving at
100? What number does everybody else set their batch size to?

> Just to be clear, it does not sound like you have transactions settleing

> twice but you have multiple batch numbers with in one settlement request.

> If

> this is correct the number of transactions per batch is configurable. The

> default number of transactions with-in a batch is 100. You can change the

> batch size in the Administrator configuration window in the EDC tab under

> advanced options.

> --

> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no

> rights.

> "Alex" wrote:

>> We had a problem in RMS 2.0 with our EDC batch Settling twice on two

>> different occasions last week. I know it's not possible to settle an EDC

>> batch after it has been settled already in RMS 2.0 but it happened. Has

>> anybody else experienced the same problem or could tell me how to avoid

>> this

>> from happening again? We do have a stable reliable and redundant Internet

>> connections so I've ruled this out.

>> Also when we settle the EDC batch (every night) I get several EDC Batch

>> numbers within the same batch when looking at the EDC Report, even though

>> our CC processor only shows one batch. We usually have the same EDC batch

>> number for about 90-95% of our transactions and the remaining % divided

>> over

>> two or 3 other EDC batch numbers even though we only batch once per day.

>> Is

>> anybody else experiencing this or does anybody else know why this

>> happens?

Posted by Jeff @ Check Point Software on March 31, 2007, 3:01 am

Please log in for more thread options

: quoted-printable

Alex,

You better check with Vital for the maximum number they will allow. 500 =
seems to ring a bell.

What do they say about the multiple batch numbers. They are the ones =
sending to it RMS.

--=20

Jeff=20
Check Point Software

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D

You must be using Outlook Express/Windows Mail or some other type of =
newsgroup reader to
see and download the file attachment(s). If you are not using a reader, =
follow
the link below to setup Outlook Express. Click on "Open with =
newsreader"
under the MS Retail Management System on the right.

http://tinyurl.com/75bgz
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D

As mentioned in my original post we have two issues/problems.

The duplicated EDC Settlement has turned out, after tedious =
investigating=20
and numerous phone call to our processor as well as Vital Support, to =
be a=20
Vital glitch. It was caused by a Vital upgrade (on their end) and has=20
affected some merchants, but has since been corrected.

This still leaves me with the issue of multiple EDC batch numbers as =
stated=20
in my original post. From day 1 I've had the batch size set to the =
maximum=20
(9999) so this shouldn't be the reason for 3 or 4 EDC batch numbers =
per=20
"batch". What else could cause each batch to have several batch =
numbers? We=20
usually have less than 180 or so transactions per daily batch.

What are the disadvantages of setting the batch size to 9999? Why does =
it=20
default to 100? And what are the advantages and disadvantages of =
leaving at=20
100? What number does everybody else set their batch size to?

> Just to be clear, it does not sound like you have transactions =
settleing
> twice but you have multiple batch numbers with in one settlement =
request.=20
> If
> this is correct the number of transactions per batch is =
configurable. The
> default number of transactions with-in a batch is 100. You can =
change the
> batch size in the Administrator configuration window in the EDC tab =
under
> advanced options.
>
> --=20
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no=20
> rights.
>
>
> "Alex" wrote:
>
>> We had a problem in RMS 2.0 with our EDC batch Settling twice on =
two
>> different occasions last week. I know it's not possible to settle =
an EDC
>> batch after it has been settled already in RMS 2.0 but it happened. =
Has
>> anybody else experienced the same problem or could tell me how to =
avoid=20
>> this
>> from happening again? We do have a stable reliable and redundant =
Internet
>> connections so I've ruled this out.
>>
>> Also when we settle the EDC batch (every night) I get several EDC =
Batch
>> numbers within the same batch when looking at the EDC Report, even =
though
>> our CC processor only shows one batch. We usually have the same EDC =
batch
>> number for about 90-95% of our transactions and the remaining % =
divided=20
>> over
>> two or 3 other EDC batch numbers even though we only batch once per =
day.=20
>> Is
>> anybody else experiencing this or does anybody else know why this=20
>> happens?
>>
>>
>>=20

------=_NextPart_000_00B0_01C77327.ABCE95F0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dwindows-1252">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#008000>Alex,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#008000></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#008000>You better check with Vital for the maximum =
number they=20
will allow.  500 seems to ring a bell.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#008000></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#008000>What do they say about the multiple batch=20
numbers.  They are the ones sending to it RMS.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR>-- <BR><BR>Jeff <BR>Check Point Software</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>You must be using Outlook Express/Windows Mail or some other type =
of=20
newsgroup reader to<BR>see and download the file attachment(s).  If =
you are=20
not using a reader, follow<BR>the link below to setup Outlook =
Express. =20
Click on "Open with newsreader"<BR>under the MS Retail Management System =
on the=20
right.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><A=20
href=3D"http://tinyurl.com/75bgz">http://tinyurl.com/75bgz</A><BR>=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #008000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
3648@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl</A>...</DIV>As=20
mentioned in my original post we have two issues/problems.<BR><BR>The=20
duplicated EDC Settlement has turned out, after tedious investigating =
<BR>and=20
numerous phone call to our processor as well as Vital Support, to be a =

<BR>Vital glitch. It was caused by a Vital upgrade (on their end) and =
has=20
<BR>affected some merchants, but has since been corrected.<BR><BR>This =
still=20
leaves me with the issue of multiple EDC batch numbers as stated =
<BR>in my=20
original post. From day 1 I've had the batch size set to the maximum=20
<BR>(9999) so this shouldn't be the reason for 3 or 4 EDC batch =
numbers per=20
<BR>"batch". What else could cause each batch to have several batch =
numbers?=20
We <BR>usually have less than 180 or so transactions per daily=20
batch.<BR><BR>What are the disadvantages of setting the batch size to =
9999?=20
Why does it <BR>default to 100? And what are the advantages and =
disadvantages=20
of leaving at <BR>100? What number does everybody else set their batch =
size=20
to?<BR><BR><BR>"Dan [MSFT]" <<A=20
=
</A>>=20
wrote in message <BR><A=20
=
3B9B8-8989-42C7-BCA7-46C3FB8D3050@microsoft.com</A>...<BR>>=20
Just to be clear, it does not sound like you have transactions=20
settleing<BR>> twice but you have multiple batch numbers with in =
one=20
settlement request. <BR>> If<BR>> this is correct the number of=20
transactions per batch is configurable. The<BR>> default number of=20
transactions with-in a batch is 100. You can change the<BR>> batch =
size in=20
the Administrator configuration window in the EDC tab under<BR>> =
advanced=20
options.<BR>><BR>> -- <BR>> This posting is provided "AS IS" =
with no=20
warranties, and confers no <BR>> rights.<BR>><BR>><BR>> =
"Alex"=20
wrote:<BR>><BR>>> We had a problem in RMS 2.0 with our EDC =
batch=20
Settling twice on two<BR>>> different occasions last week. I =
know it's=20
not possible to settle an EDC<BR>>> batch after it has been =
settled=20
already in RMS 2.0 but it happened. Has<BR>>> anybody else =
experienced=20
the same problem or could tell me how to avoid <BR>>> =
this<BR>>>=20
from happening again? We do have a stable reliable and redundant=20
Internet<BR>>> connections so I've ruled this=20
out.<BR>>><BR>>> Also when we settle the EDC batch (every =
night) I=20
get several EDC Batch<BR>>> numbers within the same batch when =
looking=20
at the EDC Report, even though<BR>>> our CC processor only shows =
one=20
batch. We usually have the same EDC batch<BR>>> number for about =
90-95%=20
of our transactions and the remaining % divided <BR>>> =
over<BR>>>=20
two or 3 other EDC batch numbers even though we only batch once per =
day.=20
<BR>>> Is<BR>>> anybody else experiencing this or does =
anybody=20
else know why this <BR>>> =
happens?<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>=20
<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=

Posted by Alex on March 31, 2007, 8:04 am

Please log in for more thread options

: quoted-printable

Jeff,=20

Thanks for the heads up on the 500, I'll check with Vital and report =
back to confirm or to let you know what Vital has to say.

Vital support is supposedly only showing 1 batch number, but the next =
batch number they are showing is 3 or 4 numbers higher than the previous =
day's batch which doesn't make any sense at all. As far as I know Vital =
is the one that sets this batch number correct?

I'll will post back and let you know. Is anybody else having the same =
issue/problem?

Alex,

You better check with Vital for the maximum number they will allow. =
500 seems to ring a bell.

What do they say about the multiple batch numbers. They are the ones =
sending to it RMS.

--=20

Jeff=20
Check Point Software

=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D

You must be using Outlook Express/Windows Mail or some other type of =
newsgroup reader to
see and download the file attachment(s). If you are not using a =
reader, follow
the link below to setup Outlook Express. Click on "Open with =
newsreader"
under the MS Retail Management System on the right.

http://tinyurl.com/75bgz
=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D

As mentioned in my original post we have two issues/problems.

The duplicated EDC Settlement has turned out, after tedious =
investigating=20
and numerous phone call to our processor as well as Vital Support, =
to be a=20
Vital glitch. It was caused by a Vital upgrade (on their end) and =
has=20
affected some merchants, but has since been corrected.

This still leaves me with the issue of multiple EDC batch numbers as =
stated=20
in my original post. From day 1 I've had the batch size set to the =
maximum=20
(9999) so this shouldn't be the reason for 3 or 4 EDC batch numbers =
per=20
"batch". What else could cause each batch to have several batch =
numbers? We=20
usually have less than 180 or so transactions per daily batch.

What are the disadvantages of setting the batch size to 9999? Why =
does it=20
default to 100? And what are the advantages and disadvantages of =
leaving at=20
100? What number does everybody else set their batch size to?

> Just to be clear, it does not sound like you have transactions =
settleing
> twice but you have multiple batch numbers with in one settlement =
request.=20
> If
> this is correct the number of transactions per batch is =
configurable. The
> default number of transactions with-in a batch is 100. You can =
change the
> batch size in the Administrator configuration window in the EDC =
tab under
> advanced options.
>
> --=20
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers =
no=20
> rights.
>
>
> "Alex" wrote:
>
>> We had a problem in RMS 2.0 with our EDC batch Settling twice on =
two
>> different occasions last week. I know it's not possible to settle =
an EDC
>> batch after it has been settled already in RMS 2.0 but it =
happened. Has
>> anybody else experienced the same problem or could tell me how to =
avoid=20
>> this
>> from happening again? We do have a stable reliable and redundant =
Internet
>> connections so I've ruled this out.
>>
>> Also when we settle the EDC batch (every night) I get several EDC =
Batch
>> numbers within the same batch when looking at the EDC Report, =
even though
>> our CC processor only shows one batch. We usually have the same =
EDC batch
>> number for about 90-95% of our transactions and the remaining % =
divided=20
>> over
>> two or 3 other EDC batch numbers even though we only batch once =
per day.=20
>> Is
>> anybody else experiencing this or does anybody else know why this =

>> happens?
>>
>>
>>=20

------=_NextPart_000_0030_01C7736B.2E3F8C40
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dwindows-1252">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Jeff, </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks for the heads up on the 500, =
I'll check with=20
Vital and report back to confirm or to let you know what Vital has to=20
say.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Vital support is =
supposedly only showing=20
1 batch number, but the next batch number they are showing is 3 or 4 =
numbers=20
higher than the previous day's batch which doesn't make any sense at =
all. As far=20
as I know Vital is the one that sets this batch number =
correct?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'll will post back and let you know. =
Is anybody=20
else having the same issue/problem?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Jeff @ Check Point Software" <<A=20
in message=20
<A=20
=
@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#008000>Alex,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#008000></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#008000>You better check with Vital for the maximum =
number=20
they will allow.  500 seems to ring a bell.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#008000></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#008000>What do they say about the multiple batch=20
numbers.  They are the ones sending to it RMS.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR>-- <BR><BR>Jeff <BR>Check Point Software</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
=
<DIV>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>You must be using Outlook Express/Windows Mail or some other type =
of=20
newsgroup reader to<BR>see and download the file attachment(s).  =
If you=20
are not using a reader, follow<BR>the link below to setup Outlook=20
Express.  Click on "Open with newsreader"<BR>under the MS Retail=20
Management System on the right.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><A=20
=
href=3D"http://tinyurl.com/75bgz">http://tinyurl.com/75bgz</A><BR>=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #008000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
3648@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl</A>...</DIV>As=20
mentioned in my original post we have two =
issues/problems.<BR><BR>The=20
duplicated EDC Settlement has turned out, after tedious =
investigating=20
<BR>and numerous phone call to our processor as well as Vital =
Support, to be=20
a <BR>Vital glitch. It was caused by a Vital upgrade (on their end) =
and has=20
<BR>affected some merchants, but has since been =
corrected.<BR><BR>This still=20
leaves me with the issue of multiple EDC batch numbers as stated =
<BR>in my=20
original post. From day 1 I've had the batch size set to the maximum =

<BR>(9999) so this shouldn't be the reason for 3 or 4 EDC batch =
numbers per=20
<BR>"batch". What else could cause each batch to have several batch =
numbers?=20
We <BR>usually have less than 180 or so transactions per daily=20
batch.<BR><BR>What are the disadvantages of setting the batch size =
to 9999?=20
Why does it <BR>default to 100? And what are the advantages and=20
disadvantages of leaving at <BR>100? What number does everybody else =
set=20
their batch size to?<BR><BR><BR>"Dan [MSFT]" <<A=20
=
</A>>=20
wrote in message <BR><A=20
=
3B9B8-8989-42C7-BCA7-46C3FB8D3050@microsoft.com</A>...<BR>>=20
Just to be clear, it does not sound like you have transactions=20
settleing<BR>> twice but you have multiple batch numbers with in =
one=20
settlement request. <BR>> If<BR>> this is correct the number =
of=20
transactions per batch is configurable. The<BR>> default number =
of=20
transactions with-in a batch is 100. You can change the<BR>> =
batch size=20
in the Administrator configuration window in the EDC tab =
under<BR>>=20
advanced options.<BR>><BR>> -- <BR>> This posting is =
provided "AS=20
IS" with no warranties, and confers no <BR>>=20
rights.<BR>><BR>><BR>> "Alex" wrote:<BR>><BR>>> We =
had a=20
problem in RMS 2.0 with our EDC batch Settling twice on =
two<BR>>>=20
different occasions last week. I know it's not possible to settle an =

EDC<BR>>> batch after it has been settled already in RMS 2.0 =
but it=20
happened. Has<BR>>> anybody else experienced the same problem =
or could=20
tell me how to avoid <BR>>> this<BR>>> from happening =
again? We=20
do have a stable reliable and redundant Internet<BR>>> =
connections so=20
I've ruled this out.<BR>>><BR>>> Also when we settle the =
EDC=20
batch (every night) I get several EDC Batch<BR>>> numbers =
within the=20
same batch when looking at the EDC Report, even though<BR>>> =
our CC=20
processor only shows one batch. We usually have the same EDC=20
batch<BR>>> number for about 90-95% of our transactions and =
the=20
remaining % divided <BR>>> over<BR>>> two or 3 other EDC =
batch=20
numbers even though we only batch once per day. <BR>>> =
Is<BR>>>=20
anybody else experiencing this or does anybody else know why this=20
<BR>>> happens?<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>=20
<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=

Similar Threads	Posted
duplicate batch from EDC settlement	June 14, 2007, 7:24 pm
Adding to settlement batch	November 10, 2007, 12:37 pm
Setup Security level for Employee to do EDC batch settlement?	June 13, 2005, 9:09 am
EDC Batch Numbers	June 19, 2008, 1:57 pm
EDC BATCH	August 2, 2006, 3:26 pm
EDC batch	October 26, 2006, 4:36 pm
Batch	January 2, 2007, 5:39 pm
auto batch with edc	July 8, 2005, 12:52 pm
POS- EDC Batch Settle	August 30, 2005, 12:52 pm
batch statuses?	October 18, 2005, 12:54 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software

XML Sitemap