|
Posted by Kinnard on December 29, 2005, 7:27 pm
Please log in for more thread options
I believe Microsoft recommends running RMS using MSDE on less than 6 POS
terminals. Does anyone have experience running RMS with 6 or more terminals
and, if so, what is your experience? Thanks for your time and knowledge.
Kinnard L. Kohler
Business Machines Systems
6101 South Shackleford Road
Little Rock, AR 72204-8606
(T) 501-375-8380
(F) 501-375-0043
Email: kinnard@removebmsar.com
|
|
Posted by Jeff on December 29, 2005, 9:35 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Kinnard,
Its not too much of a problem. We have a couple that run 6 and another that
run 7 registers on a dedicated XPP machine with 4 gig of RAM using MSDE. In
addition, they have 3 - 4 non register machines for lookups, reports, etc.
Their issues are that they are getting close to the 2 gig database size
limitation. We'll be moving them to SQL 2000 Workgroup Edition within a
couple of months.
--
*
I believe Microsoft recommends running RMS using MSDE on less than 6 POS
terminals. Does anyone have experience running RMS with 6 or more terminals
and, if so, what is your experience? Thanks for your time and knowledge.
Kinnard L. Kohler
Business Machines Systems
6101 South Shackleford Road
Little Rock, AR 72204-8606
(T) 501-375-8380
(F) 501-375-0043
Email: kinnard@removebmsar.com
|
|
Posted by Afshin Alikhani on December 30, 2005, 3:52 am
Please log in for more thread options It is a bit like Microsoft saying that RMS runs on 64MB memory. It is true
it does but you must be prepared to wait 10 minutes for a screen to update.
I do not recommend MSDE for more than 3-4 connections on a network. Also if
you have a lot of WO, Layaway, Customers, etc... where the network is used
heavily you may find degradation in performance. Past 4 POS go to Full SQL
version.
Afshin Alikhani - [afshin@retailrealm.co.uk]
--
URL http://www.retailrealm.co.uk
"Kinnard" wrote:
> I believe Microsoft recommends running RMS using MSDE on less than 6 POS
> terminals. Does anyone have experience running RMS with 6 or more terminals
> and, if so, what is your experience? Thanks for your time and knowledge.
>
> Kinnard L. Kohler
> Business Machines Systems
> 6101 South Shackleford Road
> Little Rock, AR 72204-8606
> (T) 501-375-8380
> (F) 501-375-0043
> Email: kinnard@removebmsar.com
|
|
Posted by POSable Solutio on January 1, 2006, 12:43 pm
Please log in for more thread options It's about the size of your database, not the umber of terminals. Also, you
should have a server that can keep up with the database. Plenty of memory
and fast bus & hardrives. No IDE drives.
"Kinnard" wrote:
> I believe Microsoft recommends running RMS using MSDE on less than 6 POS
> terminals. Does anyone have experience running RMS with 6 or more terminals
> and, if so, what is your experience? Thanks for your time and knowledge.
>
> Kinnard L. Kohler
> Business Machines Systems
> 6101 South Shackleford Road
> Little Rock, AR 72204-8606
> (T) 501-375-8380
> (F) 501-375-0043
> Email: kinnard@removebmsar.com
|
|
Posted by Dan Rishworth on January 1, 2006, 4:57 pm
Please log in for more thread options > It's about the size of your database, not the umber of terminals. Also, you
> should have a server that can keep up with the database. Plenty of memory
> and fast bus & hardrives. No IDE drives.
What about server OS? Does all of this assume Windows Server 2003 or is
XP-Pro acceptable for a dedicated server running MSDE and RMS HQ 1.3?
Thanks,
Dan
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Terminals, no registers | October 6, 2005, 9:32 am |
| HHT inventory Terminals | December 11, 2008, 5:06 pm |
| Portable Data Terminals | December 9, 2005, 9:53 pm |
| Credit card terminals | August 26, 2008, 12:58 pm |
| MSDE Installation Error | January 7, 2006, 1:37 am |
| MSDE Database Issue | February 9, 2007, 5:34 pm |
| RMS 2.0 With MSDE Database Lost | September 28, 2007, 4:28 pm |
| Upgraded using disk to 1.3 now MSDE error | January 19, 2006, 11:21 pm |
| Desktop Engine (MSDE 2000) SP4? | June 13, 2006, 8:44 am |
| What is the Proper MSDE Setting on Clients | February 5, 2007, 1:43 am |
|
|