|
Posted by Jason on April 7, 2006, 1:29 pm
Please log in for more thread options
I completely agree. Furthermore, the cost is not updated on child items when
the parent item is received. So every time I receive a case of coke, I need
to adjust to cost of the six-pack and singles. This is virtually impossible
with weighted cost inventory and a royal pain even with last cost method.
I was extremely disappointed to learn this about RMS. I don't understand how
companies like mine with many hundreds of parent-child items can keep up with
manually adjusting child costs... I gave up - now I update costs every 6
months except for new items, which leave me no choice.
"PRS" wrote:
> Parnet Child calculation should go both ways... If you count the quantity of
> a child item to the value of its parent then this should populate the parent
> with the value.
>
> Variance reporting in RMS out of the box is next to useless. the reports
> should be better structured to handle the structure of parent Child
> Relations..
>
>
>
> ----------------
> This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
> suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
> Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
> link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
> click "I Agree" in the message pane.
>
>
http://www.microsoft.com/Businesssolutions/Community/NewsGroups/dgbrowser/en-us/default.mspx?mid=13f400dd-581c-4803-ac1e-43af69277e6e&dg=microsoft.public.pos
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap