RMS multi-store solutions without HQ

Posted by =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Stanis=B3aw_Juz on August 6, 2009, 9:00 am

Please log in for more thread options

Hi all,

We are looking for an RMS 2.0 solution, that would work with multi-
store implementations without using HQ module. I did find one web
solution, but lost the link and can't find it now. Anyone knows about
such solutions?

Thanks,
Stan

Posted by Todd on August 7, 2009, 11:43 am

Please log in for more thread options

> Hi all,

> We are looking for an RMS 2.0 solution, that would work with multi-

> store implementations without using HQ module. I did find one web

> solution, but lost the link and can't find it now. Anyone knows about

> such solutions?

> Thanks,

> Stan

Check out:
http://www.positivetechnology.com/opsuite.htm

Posted by Dan-902 on August 7, 2009, 7:18 pm

Please log in for more thread options

Looks interesting - but what happens when you get into some technical
difficulties. Microsoft would blame Positive Tech OR/AND visa versa. Have
been down that road before with other vendors. There are enough trouble with
HQ which is made by Microsoft - a big company with lots of resources.

Dan

> Hi all,

> We are looking for an RMS 2.0 solution, that would work with multi-

> store implementations without using HQ module. I did find one web

> solution, but lost the link and can't find it now. Anyone knows about

> such solutions?

> Thanks,

> Stan

Check out:
http://www.positivetechnology.com/opsuite.htm

Posted by MikeyH on August 12, 2009, 2:15 pm

Please log in for more thread options

I know of solutions linked to ERP systems with RMS as the Front-end;
expensive of course--much more than HQ, plus the price of the ERP system.
--
Mike Haugen
mikeh@retailtechnologyexperts.com
Retail Technology Experts (RTE)

"Stanisław Juzwicki" wrote:

> Hi all,

> We are looking for an RMS 2.0 solution, that would work with multi-

> store implementations without using HQ module. I did find one web

> solution, but lost the link and can't find it now. Anyone knows about

> such solutions?

> Thanks,

> Stan