|
Posted by Philip Gass on December 14, 2006, 4:47 am
Please log in for more thread options
I have a similar spec server, similar requirements. i had to go up to 4GB of
RAM before i got much of an improvement, SQL Server just seems to eat up as
much RAM as it can get hold of! I also found that if i restarted the server
it performed much better, so i have scheduled an event to restart it every
morning at 6am so its up and ready for the days trading by the time we open
our doors, its been much much better since..
> Here's what I've got:
>
> Dell PowerEdge SC1420
> Xeon 3Ghz
> 1GB RAM (400MHz)
> 80GB C: drive (SATA, hardware mirroring)
> SBS 2003 Premium
> - not running MS Exchange
> - DHCP/DNS for 12 clients.
> - two print queues, both very lightly used
> - folder redirection of My Documents folders for 9 users
>
> Here's what I'm asking it to do (outside of the O/S based stuff above):
> Host Store Ops database
> - 2 lanes, occassionally as many as 6 concurrent SO Manager sessions.
> Host HQ Database
> - HQ Server for 4 stores
> Connection Schedule:
> - Store A (on same machine), every 3 minutes
> - Store B, every 4 minutes
> - Store C, every 5 minutes
> - Store D, every 6 minutes
> HQ Client for local Store Ops DB
> Host private IM server
> - Wildfire (CPU usage rarely over 1%, memory usage <10MB)
> Automated daily backup to DVD using NTI Backup Now! 4
>
> Here's how hard it works:
> CPU usage
> - rarely below 40%, often >90% when more than one store is connected
> :shock:
> Memory usage
> - usually <200MB available
>
> I'm running Fast Ethernet (100Mbps) LAN (3Com OfficeConnect switches) and
> the server doesn't have to act as a router or firewall. My Network
> Utilization is rarely over 1% at the server.
>
> I plan to double the RAM to 2GB before the end of the week. It's cheap
> and
> I am hoping it will help. SQL Server routinely uses >350MB (two
> processes,
> one as Administrator [300MB] and another as SYSTEM [50MB]).
>
> Question: Should I budget for a dedicated HQ server next year?
>
> Is >90% CPU usage normal for this scenario? I didn't think I was asking
> all
> that much of my hardware, but at times the response from the server is
> pretty
> slow.
>
> CPU usage *really* spikes when the HQ Client connects to HQ server on the
> same machine.
>
> I'd love to hear from anyone with similar usage and/or hardware.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
> --
> Stop fishing for e-mail
|