|
Posted by Aldo on December 9, 2005, 5:15 pm
Please log in for more thread options I forgot to list it:
I delete the offline database and created new one... the results still are
the same...
what could be?
Thanks
"Glenn Adams [MVP - Retail Mgmt]" wrote:
> Well, number 4 on your list would have been my bet - a column definition
> change on the main database.
>
> You can create a new local database for the offline, and it will be
> populated with everything it needs at the next Z-report, assuming it doesn't
> fail again. The local offline database doesn't need to keep any historical
> data, so creating a new one and starting over is fine.
>
> --
> --
> Glenn Adams
> Tiber Creek Consulting
> http://www.tibercreek.com
> glenn@tibercreek.com
> ----------------------------------------------
> Please DO NOT respond to me directly but post all responses here in the
> newsgroup so that all can share the information
>
> > Hi, This question is about the RMS Synchronize Offline Database feature,
> > few
> > months ago it use to work fine, but now it is doing this:
> >
> > after close the POS, and when: Synchronize Offline Database >
> > Synchronizing
> > table: Item
> > (it syncs nice the Alias and the Customer table, but is breaks when Item
> > table and returns this message:)
> >
> > Microsoft Store Operations POS
> > Run-time error '-2147217833 (80040e57)':
> > String or binary data would be truncated.
> >
> >
> > I tried this:
> > 1- Since the POS client its a firewalled windows xp SP2 machine, I make 2
> > exeptions: I opened port 1433 with subnet scope, also enabled the
> > C:Program
> > FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQLbinnsqlservr.exe with subnet scope.
> > and it makes no difference
> > 2- I tried to create the database locally for testing but it cant be the
> > same machine as the offline database.
> > Things are the same.
> > 3-I verified the data integrity of Item table and it seems to be ok, no
> > duplicated items, no null lookup fields, etc.
> > Things are the same.
> > 4- I analize the source and target columns lenght and i fixed a difference
> > of size in SubDescription3 field, but it makes no difference, the error
> > code
> > is the same and the halt of proccess persist like a nightmare
> >
> > Thanks for readint this post
>
>
>
|