|
Posted by Marc on February 4, 2008, 7:32 pm
Please log in for more thread options I understand your point, but in this case I would bet the fault in the logic
is on the RMS side. The issuing bank actually issued a chargeback on this
transaction because there was no approval code, so I will be pursuing this
with the processor.
I must note that the whole scenario causing this series of transactions
(sale-refund-void) was a confusing mess not likely to occur normally.
Thanks,
Marc
>I think the non-approval of CC trxs is based on the CC processor. It is my
> understanding that a void does not need to receive approval because
> approval
> represents being able to draft (debit) on an account. You might want to
> ask
> your CC processor about this.
> --
> Jocelyn
>
>
> "Marc" wrote:
>
>> Here's a little something you may want to watch out for.
>> Recently a manager of ours reversed a return with a recall and void. It
>> was
>> a credit card tranaction. Unfortunately the transaction processed fine,
>> but
>> no approval code was received for the charge. It seems that RMS assumes
>> that
>> a void is a 'refund' transaction and does not attempt to get an approval.
>> We
>> now know to use voids only to cancel a sale transaction.
>>
>> Marc
>>
>>
>>
|