|
Posted by Mano on September 26, 2009, 3:20 am
Please log in for more thread options
Afshin,
Thanks for your reply. The reason I used SQL to update HQID is because I
was told that 101 worksheet should be used only when the store is setup at
first. Since our stores have been operating for a while, I thought that using
101 would wipe out my data. Are you saying that it is sage to use 101 without
loosing any data at the store level.
Mano
"Afshin" wrote:
> WRONG way to do. Anytime you can run the 101 worksheet and his will ensure
> that all records n Store have correct HQID. Run this first. Then look at
> the store to see if you have items with blank HQID. Doing it through SQL
> Scrip could be dangerous if there is typo or mis entry.
>
> Afshin Alikhani - afshin@rrdisti.com
> Retail Realm
> = = = = = =
>
> >I first thought the same thing and looked at the HQID for the duplicates.
> > THey are the same. Obvisouly the id at the item table are different and
> > HQID
> > is same. One thing that we did is that this HQID was updated few months
> > ago
> > at the store level from HQ using sql script.
> >
> > Mano
> >
> > "Afshin" wrote:
> >
> >> 250 worksheet does not (should not) duplicate your Item Data, unless same
> >> item had been created manually at the store before transfer. Have a look
> >> and see if the duplicated items at store have HQID entries.
> >>
> >> Afshin Alikhani - afshin@rrdisti.com
> >> Retail Realm Distribution
> >> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> > We have a HQ and several stores connecting to it. All items are
> >> > created
> >> > from HQ and sent to store for receiving. In some instances when a 250
> >> > is
> >> > sent
> >> > twice to the store the item is duplicated at the store level. All
> >> > information is exactly the same. On the flip side, when you create an
> >> > item
> >> > at the store level with the same sku it gives an error "Itemlookup code
> >> > already exists". Why doesnt this happen with the polling and prevent
> >> > the
> >> > duplicate sku.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for your help
> >> > Mano
> >> >
> >>
>
|