|
Posted by Allan Martin on May 30, 2007, 9:59 am
Please log in for more thread options
>I agree with you, Allan... but it's still crappy policy, and one that does
>not leave their customers happy. To be honest, if there were a decent
>alternative (that I could easily port everything to), I would.
>
> But, alas, there isn't. And it's cheaper to go along with Intuit's crappy
> policies than to migrate to something else.
Migrate where? Charging for tax table subscriptions is standard in the
industry. So is sunsetting . Just consider it a cost of doing business and
move on.
I'm more concerned with the rising price of gas, heating oil and food.
Don't get me started on all the taxes tacked on to a good bottle of scotch
or the price of new homes.
>
> grep
>
> Allan Martin wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.gripe2ed.com/scoop/story/2007/5/29/0737/80324
>>
>>
>>
>> Article is incorrect. Intuit has made these types of changes in patches
>> since 1999. My take is who gives a shit? Allan says if you process
>> payroll in QB then subscribe to the payroll service. End of story. Its
>> either Intuit's way or take the highway.
>>
>>
>> When will you people stop crying in my beer? It is May of 2007 and this
>> has been Intuit's tax table subscription policy since September 1999. Get
>> over it already.
>>
>>
>> Read my lips. "It will not change".
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap