|
Posted by Allan Martin on November 8, 2006, 11:18 am
Please log in for more thread options
>
>>>
>>>> Oops, forgot to say that the version I installed was Premier
>>>> Accountant. The file size jumped 5mb.
>>>
>>>
>>> What, no mention of the all new accountants' copy feature? This one
>>> breakthrough advance for many is worth the upgrade. How about the new
>>> way the program automacally fills in general ledger accounts. This
>>> feature also makes the upgrade worth while. Why wouldn't you expect the
>>> file size to increase. Added functionality often requires a little more
>>> wiggle room.
>>
>> As I said, I haven't had an opportunity to actually work with the version
>> yet, just peek around inside a few test-upgraded company files.
>>
>> Which breakthrough advances in the Acct's copy are you speaking of? The
>> importation of accountant's changes with notes, better detail in audit
>> trail?
>>
>> As for the autofill of GL accounts with vendor's I haven't used it. How
>> is this different from auto-recalling the last transaction for that
>> vendor? I selected to keep that preference since most of the vendors in
>> the company file I upgraded have Items assigned to their bills.
>>
>> Since you've used the features enough to say they're worth the upgrade
>> then why not elaborate on them?
>
> The new features are so well documented that it seems a waste of my time
> but here goes.
>
> The accountant's copy feature is now on steriods. Prior to 2007 the
> accountant was quite limited in what he/she could actually do with the
> file. Now major modifications can be made (not just journal entries) and
> have it all sync back to the client all the while notifiying the client
> exactly what changes were made and asking for their approval to make the
> changes.
>
> Auto-recalling the last transaction sometimes leads to posting to the
> wrong account over and over again. There are situations where an odd
> transaction requires a change in the account that usually gets posted to.
> Prior versions remembered this odd coding and recalled it for the next
> transaction. Many end users just except this new coding and contiue to use
> it. Version 2007 is intelligent enough to avoid this common error.
Let me correct myself. I just noticed that it is not working the way I
thought it would work. If you consistently code a vendor to rent and then
happen to code it to repairs and maintenance for one transaction the program
stops entering a general ledger code. Not very intelligent.
>
> Don't get me started on the upgraded financial statement designer. I love
> it. My biggest complait about the module has been answered. Now when the
> chart of accounts has been modified the financial statement designer tells
> the user that the statement you want to print does not refect the change
> and can help you rectify the problem.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Tara
>>
>
>
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap