|
Posted by Haskel LaPort on August 30, 2009, 8:45 am
Please log in for more thread options
> Laura wrote:
>>> Meebers wrote:
>>>>>> What I am trying to do is to show total income for "year to date." I
>>>>>> send out invoices on 1 Dec each year, they are due 1 Jan. Some
>>>>>> customers pay during the month of Dec (early) while the majority of
>>>>>> the customers pay after 1 Jan. I send all payments to the
>>>>>> non-deposited account and then sometime after the 1st of January, I
>>>>>> deposit them into the bank account. If I do a report to show income
>>>>>> "year to date' it obviously leaves out those who paid early. I could
>>>>>> include December, but that would mix income from both years. I am
>>>>>> sure this is not a new problem, but was wondering how things like
>>>>>> this are handled? TIA
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you saying that you only issue one invoice to each of your
>>>>> customers each December 1st that covers an entire year?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes.....it is a yearly assessment...covers 1 Jan thru 31 Dec
>>>
>>>
>>> My question is what difference does it make, really? If you the company
>>> really is on cash accounting basis, record receipts when they're
>>> received. At worst the first year will have a slight spike from the
>>> early payers but after that almost certainly the same folks who pay
>>> early this year will next, and the next, and the next... Likewise w/
>>> the late-bloomers; they'll habitually be late. Hence, over more than a
>>> single year it'll all work out and you'll not have to do anything extra
>>> nor try to justify some shenanigans on holding checks or other
>>> bookkeeping legerdemain to make some artificially-contrived neat-looking
>>> receipt of income in any given calendar year.
>>>
>>> If the issue is you want to be able to determine which clients are paid
>>> for the current service year, that's a different question/search.
>>
>> I believe he wants to show the income related to those that paid for 2009
>> services on a 2009 P&L even if they paid in 2008.
> ...
> I understand that; that's a different question in reality, however; it's
> an artificial P&L that reflects the way they wish things were rather than
> how they are. If he wants that report imo he should code for it by some
> other technique than dating.
>
> But, as far as the P&L, after the first year it'll all balance out
> anyway--the specific early payments will show up in the previous year,
> sure, but next year they'll balance almost identically because it'll be
> highly unlikely the payers' habits will change drastically from year to
> year.
>
> $0.02, imo, ymmv, etc., etc., of course...(and, of course, I'm an engineer
> so it just seems logical... :) )
If you were a CPA such as moi, then my sugestion would make a hell of a lot
more sense (cents :)) than your idea.
>
> --
|