Home Page link  

1920 x 1200 = 22 transactions; 640 x 480 = 2 transactions

 

Quicken Personal Finance Discussions - Quicken - personal finance software discussions 

get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
1920 x 1200 = 22 transactions; 640 x 480 = 2 transactions Bob Wang 02-24-2008
Posted by Bob Wang on February 24, 2008, 5:31 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Port:

You may already have Full Register View (F11) turned on, but if you don't, I
can get another transaction to display by choosing that option.

Bob

>>>
PortStG wrote:
>> For the record, I was using Q2008 Deluxe with XP at 1024 X
>> 768 on a 17" CRT. I was able to see 12 2 line transactions instead
>> of the 10 indicated above.
>> When I went to a higher resolution, I could get a
>> couple more but I needed a magnifying glass to read them.

"John Pollard" wrote:
>If that's true, you need glasses ... or a new prescription.

Nope. Eyes are fine.

>I've got a 15" monitor using 1680 x 1050 resolution. I've got
>15 two-line transactions visible in my non-investment account
>register ... and I have no trouble seeing those transactions.

I have no idea why the difference. But my monitor isn't even capable
of resolution that high.
By "non-investment account", would that have a Register view like I
described earlier with the 1/2" spam line across the bottom and a
similar size line button line just above that? If I could have gotten
rid of those, I could have gotten a couple more transactions into
view. Still wouldn't have matched Q98 but would have been a little
better.

Port


Posted by Han on February 24, 2008, 5:34 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> Port:
>
> You may already have Full Register View (F11) turned on, but if you
> don't, I can get another transaction to display by choosing that
> option.
>
> Bob
>
Wow!! That's fantastic! Thanks for the hint of that toggle!

--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid

Posted by Bob Wang on February 24, 2008, 5:46 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Han:

You're welcome.
I can squeeze out 24 transactions with Q2008 H&B R6 maximized, and in Full
Register View at 1920 x 1200.
Odd quirk is that after all my screen changes, now I only get 21
transactions at 1920 x 1200 in my un-maxed window.

Bob

>>>

> Port:
>
> You may already have Full Register View (F11) turned on, but if you
> don't, I can get another transaction to display by choosing that
> option.
>
> Bob
>
Wow!! That's fantastic! Thanks for the hint of that toggle!

--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid


Posted by Bob Wang on February 24, 2008, 6:03 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Got back to 22 transactions by switching to 1600 x 1200, re-sizing window,
then back to 1920 x 1200.
Don't know why I couldn't just re-size in 1920 x 1200 resolution.

>>>
Han:

You're welcome.
I can squeeze out 24 transactions with Q2008 H&B R6 maximized, and in Full
Register View at 1920 x 1200.
Odd quirk is that after all my screen changes, now I only get 21
transactions at 1920 x 1200 in my un-maxed window.

Bob

>>>

> Port:
>
> You may already have Full Register View (F11) turned on, but if you
> don't, I can get another transaction to display by choosing that
> option.
>
> Bob
>
Wow!! That's fantastic! Thanks for the hint of that toggle!

--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid


Posted by PortStG on February 24, 2008, 5:50 pm
Please log in for more thread options
"Bob Wang" wrote:
>You may already have Full Register View (F11) turned on, but if you don't, I
>can get another transaction to display by choosing that option.

I didn't try the F11 key but I checkmarked a box somewhere in
Preferences to maximize the Register view. Not sure if that does the
same thing or not.
I've already uninstalled Q2008 and reinstalled Q98 at this point and
have to run errands at the moment but maybe I'll have time to undo and
redo and try again when I get back.

Port

Similar ThreadsPosted
Updating Upcoming Transactions Without Updating all Future Transactions February 25, 2008, 4:51 pm
"You should use two transactions" February 27, 2009, 5:43 pm
Re: Schedulling transactions June 10, 2006, 9:36 pm
Re-reconciling transactions October 10, 2006, 11:42 pm
ghost transactions January 4, 2007, 4:38 pm
What's best report for all transactions? January 19, 2007, 1:50 pm
How do I link transactions February 19, 2007, 1:27 am
red flag no transactions February 27, 2007, 8:47 pm
You Have Upcoming Transactions April 2, 2007, 9:33 am
Placeholder Transactions April 14, 2007, 8:03 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap