|
Posted by kirk on April 23, 2007, 10:56 am
Please log in for more thread options > kirk wrote:
> > wrote:
> >> kirk wrote:
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> kirk wrote:
> >>>>> On Apr 22, 2:40 pm, "John Pollard" wrote:
> >>>>>> kirk wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Q07 Premier, WIN XP/Pro SP2
>
> >>>>>>> Testing IRR reporting, so setup test account and
> >>>>>>> experimented but keep getting as very curious
> >>>>>>> result. Everytime I add a new test security (making
> >>>>>>> sure that I've never used the security name before
> >>>>>>> and that it is not in the Security List), it
> >>>>>>> appears to "acquire" some Price History. I've
> >>>>>>> tried this with six different security names and
> >>>>>>> when I look into Security Detail, Price History,
> >>>>>>> there are 2-4 prices for each security. They are on
> >>>>>>> different dates for different amounts?
>
> >>>>>>> Anyone help on this?
> >>>>>> What do you need help with? I don't see a problem
> >>>>>> described.
>
> >>>>> I am adding new securities, there shouldn't be a price
> >>>>> history?
>
> >>>> Every security that wasn't issued today has a price
> >>>> history: see Yahoo, etc..
>
> >>>> Quicken includes some price history when it sets up a
> >>>> security that is new to your specific Quicken data; it
> >>>> has for some time ... actually, as long as I can
> >>>> remember (though I confess, my memory is not what it
> >>>> used to be). I still don't see a problem? You are the
> >>>> first person I can ever recall asking for "help" with
> >>>> this. You can easily delete the prices if you don't
> >>>> want them.
>
> >>>> --
> >>>> John Pollard
> >>>> First initial underscore Last name at mchsi dot com
> >>>> Please reply to newsgroup- Hide quoted text -
>
> >>>> - Show quoted text -
>
> >>> I am trying to do this to test IRR calculations for
> >>> accounts that include corporate mergers.. So I am
> >>> experimenting with a test accout and using ficticious
> >>> security names like test1, test2, testnever, etc.. so
> >>> that there couldn't be any price history. I have
> >>> observed that IRR calculations are different for mergers
> >>> depending on whether or not there is a price entered on
> >>> the ADD SHARES transaction.
>
> >> Quicken does not - can not - download any prices for a
> >> non-existant security - one that has no ticker symbol.
>
> >> If you supply Quicken with a false security name, but a
> >> real ticker symbol; Quicken doesn't care. Never has.
> >> Quicken doesn't care what the name of the security is -
> >> in fact, you can have multiple security names with the
> >> same ticker symbol ... they will all get the same
> >> "prices". So: if you add a new security in Quicken with
> >> a totally phony name, but with a real ticker symbol ...
> >> you will get prices for the real-world security that has
> >> that ticker symbol.
>
> >> While I'm not really clear what you can hope to
> >> accomplish, I suggest you start by accepting the way
> >> Quicken works.
>
> >> Then: if you need an empty price history for "test"
> >> securities that have "real" ticker symbols, either:
>
> >> Do not supply a ticker symbol when you create the new
> >> test security,
>
> >> or
>
> >> Delete the price history that Quicken downloads for
> >> those test securities before you enter any test
> >> transactions for those securities (but expect that any
> >> time you do any download that includes prices, you will
> >> see prices for any security in your Quicken data that
> >> has a valid ticker symbol).
>
> >> (You can select multiple Quicken price history records
> >> just as you would select multiple files in Windows
> >> Explorer ... then click Delete to get rid of them all.)
>
> >> --
> >> John Pollard
> >> First initial underscore Last name at mchsi dot com
> >> Please reply to newsgroup- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > I never used a ticker for any of these ficiticious
> > securities, always "Added Manually"
>
> > I am experimenting with this simply because there is a
> > difference in how Q treats ADD SHARES if there is a price
> > given or not. If the ADD SHARES includes a price, then
> > that transaction is reflected in the "Investments" column
> > of the Investment Performance (IRR) report. If the ADD
> > SHARES doesn't have a price, then Q does NOT reflect that
> > in that column. The ADD SHARES have come from a number
> > of mergers that have occurred in the past three months
> > and the transactions downloaded from my FI's are using
> > REMOVE SHARES/ADD SHARES to reflect the merger. (I
> > believe) that none of these showed the actual cost basis
> > (not sure I should expect the FI to include the cost
> > basis) so I have had to manually adjust these
> > transactions to reflect the actual cost (and hence get
> > consistency for IRR calcs).
>
> > Now, I am happy to accept the the way Q works (as long as
> > 1. its accuracte and 2. I can understand the "rules" -
> > which are not always obvious) but - I cannot see why or
> > where Q is adding price history to a ficticious security?
> > If its doing that who knows what other things its up to?
> > I can provider screenshots if needed.
>
> > /d
>
> From your original post:
>
> "Everytime I add a new test security (making sure that I've
> never used the security name before and that it is not in the
> Security List), it appears to 'acquire' some Price History."
>
> The impression given by that statement was that the act of
> adding the new security produced prices in your price history
> ... so I explained how that could happen. You didn't say that
> you only noticed prices in your price history after you entered
> transactions.
>
> Now you say you are not supplying ticker symbols for your test
> securities, and since Quicken can not download any prices
> ("quotes" or "historical") for securities that have no ticker
> symbol, I can deduce what is happening.
>
> You are causing the prices to be entered in your price history
> by entering transactions in your investment account which have
> prices. Whenever you enter an investment transaction in Quicken
> that contains a security price, and there is no existing price
> for that security in your price history for that date, Quicken
> enters the price from the investment transaction into your price
> history. This is normal behavior and has been present from the
> first day I used Quicken.
>
> --
> John Pollard
> First initial underscore Last name at mchsi dot com
> Please reply to newsgroup- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
"The impression given by that statement was that the act of
adding the new security produced prices in your price history"
That's exactly what I'm observing. Let me summarize.
Check Securities List, ADD SHARES for a security name that doesn't
exist (add manually without Ticker and without Price)
Check Summary tab for account, shows ONLY the Lot for the ADD'ed
SHARES transaction (which had a zero Cost Basis since no price was
entered)
Check Securities Detail, the *only* transaction in Transaction History
for this security is the ADD SHARES, but Edit Price History shows one
entry for a price of $67.265 on 2/22/06.
In that TEST account there are no trannsactions date 2/22/06
For a FInd All of all transactions dates 2/22/06, there are a number
of credit card and checking transactions, and some dividends ...
nothing with a security name like the ficitious one I created.
Checked for other ficitious security names that I'd ADD'ed.
"You are causing the prices to be entered in your price history
by entering transactions in your investment account which have
prices. Whenever you enter an investment transaction in Quicken
that contains a security price, and there is no existing price
for that security in your price history for that date, Quicken
enters the price from the investment transaction into your price
history. This is normal behavior and has been present from the
first day I used Quicken. "
So I really can't see where Q is pick these prices up from? From the
above I do not believe that I am causing prices to be entered. It
still looks to me like Q is incorrectly associating price history.
/d
|