|
Posted by Michael Arm on December 11, 2008, 4:53 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>kaplan3jiim@example.com wrote:
>
>> It's never an issue with my personal checkbook where I only write the
>> occasional check, although over the years I have had checks clear that
>> were not signed.
>
>For several years I printed checks - with a signature - using word. I
>used a mail merge system, with the primary document the check "template"
>and a secondary document just to hold the data fields (payee, date,
>amount, etc.)
>
>The point is, I simply placed my name in the template as a signature
>font. No one to whom I ever sent a check cared a bit that the
>"signature" was a Microsoft font and not in fact my signature. Neither
>did my bank.
>
>It seems that signing checks in your true hand with ink only when you
>are in fact issuing a check is NOT an effective internal control. So
>your idea to sign them in bulk before you print them sounds fine to me.
>
>Doug
I scanned my sig in and created a small .jpg file that I paste into
documents such as contracts that need to be emailed or faxed. Have
done this for checks, however.
Mike
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap