|
Posted by Andrew on September 26, 2007, 8:21 am
Please log in for more thread options VinnyL wrote:
> YES!!! Me too... I just caved and got Q2008 myself and I found the
> very same thing.... I thought I must be missing something and
> unfortunately I guess I'm not. Really strange as they hyped these
> very features you mention for the 2007 release.
>
> I'm very disappointed in Intuit for this one.
>
>> I broke down and bought Q2008 after all; thinking that the 'new'
>> method of tagging transactions might hold some interest. I do mess
>> around the categories and classes, so I thought perhaps this might
>> be one area in Q2008 that holds promise for me.
>>
>> One thing I immediately notice is that the categories list no longer
>> shows you the number of transactions that each categories has
>> associated with it without having to click on the minireport that is
>> available now - and at that, it's one a time ; not the entire set
>> (with scrolling) one had before. The other thing that I don't like
>> is the 'Show Unused Categories' filter. In that panel, it's not
>> immediately obvious (like it was in Q2007) that if you have are
>> using some categories like A:B:C and A:D:E even if you don't
>> singularly use category A, but indeed have sub transactions (B, C,
>> D, and E in the example), then it appears that you can simply delete
>> category A and take all the others below it without realizing it. Q
>> tells you that category A is not being used - strictly speaking,
>> that's true, but it should have some indicator like there are valid
>> children below it. Yes, I know that it asks you if you wish to merge
>> the subcategories, but one shouldn't have gotten that far. Anyone else
>> bothered by this? That panel seems a large step
>> backwards from what Q2007 had.
>>
>> --
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> Regards -
>>
>> - Andrew
I am surprised that this wasn't brought up by some of the beta testers
before Q2008 was let out of the door. Oh well. "The Lord taketh, the Lord
giveth" (or something like that) regarding features/capabilities in Q !
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
Regards -
- Andrew
|