|
Posted by Andrew DeFaria on September 14, 2007, 11:31 pm
Please log in for more thread options This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030503000904030502030109
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bob Wang wrote:
> I'm running a 3 1/2 year old Pentium 4, 3 GHz, 1 MB RAM.
A whole 1 MB of RAM! Man that's hot! ;-)
> My main Quicken file is 24MB, transactions going back to 1986. Quicken
> opens on one account with 6,000 transactions. Clicking on my other
> account with 8,000 transactions is instantaneous. (maybe a 0.5 sec delay)
>
> Just running Quicken, I go from 400MB available memory down to 280MB
> if I click on 50 accounts. My main file has >180 accounts. After
> clicking on the 12th account or so, there is a noticeable lag opening
> further accounts. I would just close Quicken and restart if I need to
> access more than a dozen accounts.
>
> In my situation going from 400MB to 280MB by deliberately doing
> something un-natural is not a problem.
>
> Your situation may be different, but I don't think a blanket
> condemnation of Quicken 2008 if fair.
Sometimes I don't get you guys. "I have all my data for 20 years! My
Quicken Database is 50 Megs. I have thousands of accounts and
transactions, non of which I'll ever refer to in my life. I like keeping
everything because organizing shit's too difficult and time consuming
for me. Why the hell is Quicken so damn slow!". Geeze. Clean up for
crying out loud! Geeze!
--
Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com> Diplomacy - the art of letting someone have your way.
--------------030503000904030502030109
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Bob Wang wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:g5CdnTz1R-ZtjHbbnZ2dnUVZ_vWtnZ2d@comcast.com"
type="cite">I'm running a 3 1/2 year old Pentium 4, 3 GHz, 1 MB RAM.<br>
</blockquote>
A whole 1 MB of RAM! Man that's hot! <span class="moz-smiley-s3"><span>
;-) </span></span><br>
<blockquote cite="mid:g5CdnTz1R-ZtjHbbnZ2dnUVZ_vWtnZ2d@comcast.com"
type="cite">My main Quicken file is 24MB, transactions going back to
1986. Quicken opens on one account with 6,000 transactions. Clicking on
my other account with 8,000 transactions is instantaneous. (maybe a
0.5 sec delay)<br>
<br>
Just running Quicken, I go from 400MB available memory down to 280MB if
I click on 50 accounts. My main file has >180 accounts. After
clicking on the 12th account or so, there is a noticeable lag opening
further accounts. I would just close Quicken and restart if I need to
access more than a dozen accounts.<br>
<br>
In my situation going from 400MB to 280MB by deliberately doing
something un-natural is not a problem.<br>
<br>
Your situation may be different, but I don't think a blanket
condemnation of Quicken 2008 if fair.<br>
</blockquote>
Sometimes I don't get you guys. "I have all my data for 20 years! My
Quicken Database is 50 Megs. I have thousands of accounts and
transactions, non of which I'll ever refer to in my life. I like
keeping everything because organizing shit's too difficult and time
consuming for me. Why the hell is Quicken so damn slow!". Geeze. Clean
up for crying out loud! Geeze!<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<a href="http://defaria.com">Andrew DeFaria</a><br>
<small><font color="#999999">Diplomacy - the art of letting someone
have your way.</font></small>
</div>
</body>
</html>
--------------030503000904030502030109--
|