Home Page link  

Caution - Quicken 08 is a memory HOG

 

Quicken Personal Finance Discussions - Quicken - personal finance software discussions

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Caution - Quicken 08 is a memory HOG Thomas Darlington 09-14-2007
Posted by Thomas Darlington on September 14, 2007, 5:42 pm
Please log in for more thread options
I am trying to upgrade to Quicken 08.
I ahve been using Quicken for 20+ years.
My QDF file (in 06) is about 30 Megs.

I noticed that it takes Quicken 08 several seconds to go from account to
account
when reconciling downloaded transactions - I have about 50 accounts.

I ran an experiment comparing the 06 amd 08 verions
(still running 06 on another PC).
Ran both with the Task Manager running.
Quicken 08 starts up using 50 Megs of memory.
When I click thru the accounts it grows rapidly.
When I clicked thru all 50 accounts it hit over 600 Megs.

Did the same with 06 version.
Starts up using 28 Megs.
I opened EVERY one of my 50 accounts - only used 46 Megs of RAM.

Apparently the new version must suck in EVERY transaction
when clicking on the account.

I think I will stick with Quicken 06.


Posted by Bob Wang on September 14, 2007, 6:47 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Tom:

I don't see this as a real issue.
I'm running a 3 1/2 year old Pentium 4, 3 GHz, 1 MB RAM.
My main Quicken file is 24MB, transactions going back to 1986.
Quicken opens on one account with 6,000 transactions.
Clicking on my other account with 8,000 transactions is instantaneous.
(maybe a 0.5 sec delay)

Just running Quicken, I go from 400MB available memory down to 280MB if I
click on 50 accounts.
My main file has >180 accounts.
After clicking on the 12th account or so, there is a noticeable lag opening
further accounts.
I would just close Quicken and restart if I need to access more than a dozen
accounts.

In my situation going from 400MB to 280MB by deliberately doing something
un-natural is not a problem.

Your situation may be different, but I don't think a blanket condemnation of
Quicken 2008 if fair.

Bob

>>>
I am trying to upgrade to Quicken 08.
I ahve been using Quicken for 20+ years.
My QDF file (in 06) is about 30 Megs.

I noticed that it takes Quicken 08 several seconds to go from account to
account
when reconciling downloaded transactions - I have about 50 accounts.

I ran an experiment comparing the 06 amd 08 verions
(still running 06 on another PC).
Ran both with the Task Manager running.
Quicken 08 starts up using 50 Megs of memory.
When I click thru the accounts it grows rapidly.
When I clicked thru all 50 accounts it hit over 600 Megs.

Did the same with 06 version.
Starts up using 28 Megs.
I opened EVERY one of my 50 accounts - only used 46 Megs of RAM.

Apparently the new version must suck in EVERY transaction
when clicking on the account.

I think I will stick with Quicken 06.



Posted by Andrew DeFaria on September 14, 2007, 11:31 pm
Please log in for more thread options
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030503000904030502030109
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Bob Wang wrote:
> I'm running a 3 1/2 year old Pentium 4, 3 GHz, 1 MB RAM.
A whole 1 MB of RAM! Man that's hot! ;-)
> My main Quicken file is 24MB, transactions going back to 1986. Quicken
> opens on one account with 6,000 transactions. Clicking on my other
> account with 8,000 transactions is instantaneous. (maybe a 0.5 sec delay)
>
> Just running Quicken, I go from 400MB available memory down to 280MB
> if I click on 50 accounts. My main file has >180 accounts. After
> clicking on the 12th account or so, there is a noticeable lag opening
> further accounts. I would just close Quicken and restart if I need to
> access more than a dozen accounts.
>
> In my situation going from 400MB to 280MB by deliberately doing
> something un-natural is not a problem.
>
> Your situation may be different, but I don't think a blanket
> condemnation of Quicken 2008 if fair.
Sometimes I don't get you guys. "I have all my data for 20 years! My
Quicken Database is 50 Megs. I have thousands of accounts and
transactions, non of which I'll ever refer to in my life. I like keeping
everything because organizing shit's too difficult and time consuming
for me. Why the hell is Quicken so damn slow!". Geeze. Clean up for
crying out loud! Geeze!
--
Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
Diplomacy - the art of letting someone have your way.

--------------030503000904030502030109
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Bob Wang wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:g5CdnTz1R-ZtjHbbnZ2dnUVZ_vWtnZ2d@comcast.com"
type="cite">I'm running a 3 1/2 year old Pentium 4, 3 GHz, 1 MB RAM.<br>
</blockquote>
A whole 1 MB of RAM! Man that's hot! <span class="moz-smiley-s3"><span>
;-) </span></span><br>
<blockquote cite="mid:g5CdnTz1R-ZtjHbbnZ2dnUVZ_vWtnZ2d@comcast.com"
type="cite">My main Quicken file is 24MB, transactions going back to
1986. Quicken opens on one account with 6,000 transactions. Clicking on
my other account with 8,000 transactions is instantaneous.&nbsp; (maybe a
0.5 sec delay)<br>
<br>
Just running Quicken, I go from 400MB available memory down to 280MB if
I&nbsp; click on 50 accounts. My main file has &gt;180 accounts. After
clicking on the 12th account or so, there is a noticeable lag opening&nbsp;
further accounts. I would just close Quicken and restart if I need to
access more than a dozen accounts.<br>
<br>
In my situation going from 400MB to 280MB by deliberately doing
something un-natural is not a problem.<br>
<br>
Your situation may be different, but I don't think a blanket
condemnation of Quicken 2008 if fair.<br>
</blockquote>
Sometimes I don't get you guys. "I have all my data for 20 years! My
Quicken Database is 50 Megs. I have thousands of accounts and
transactions, non of which I'll ever refer to in my life. I like
keeping everything because organizing shit's too difficult and time
consuming for me. Why the hell is Quicken so damn slow!". Geeze. Clean
up for crying out loud! Geeze!<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<a href="http://defaria.com">Andrew DeFaria</a><br>
<small><font color="#999999">Diplomacy - the art of letting someone
have your way.</font></small>
</div>
</body>
</html>

--------------030503000904030502030109--

Similar ThreadsPosted
Quicken 2007 - Out of memory when doing update = corrupted data file September 30, 2006, 11:12 pm
Q07 Out of Memory September 8, 2006, 3:37 pm
Q07 Out of Memory September 9, 2006, 12:38 am
Down Tax Memory Lane February 9, 2008, 5:04 pm
More Memory = Faster Validation February 10, 2007, 6:46 am
OT: Most Vista machines can only "see" ~3GB of memory September 15, 2007, 3:16 pm
Q08 H&B gobbles up all memory then fails December 24, 2007, 6:01 pm
How do I clear the memory of imported transactions? June 20, 2007, 9:14 pm
How do I export a single brokerage account from Quicken to a new Quicken File? November 14, 2006, 12:18 am
Can Quicken 2000 Basic & Quicken 2005 Deluxe Cohabit? June 24, 2007, 8:36 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap