Home Page link  

Corporate spin off in Q2006

 

Quicken Personal Finance Discussions - Quicken - personal finance software discussions

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Corporate spin off in Q2006 gbottolfsen 04-03-2007
Posted by R. C. White on April 4, 2007, 11:50 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Hi, AA.

Thanks for that URL (http://www.altria.com/investors/02_20_02_example.asp).

> At the end of the
> transaction shouldn't Altria be 65.90 and Kraft be 31.66?

No. Those are the Fair Market Values of those shares, NOT their adjusted
bases in your hands. Before the spin-off, you had a "paper gain" in Altria;
it had cost you $77 and was worth $87.81. After the spinoff, your total
adjusted basis should not have changed; it should still be $77 times the
number of Altria shares (since you still have the same number of Altria
shares, too).

There are several ways to compute your new basis outside of Quicken, using
good old pencil and paper. One way is to calculate that Altria is worth
$65.90/$87.81 = 75% (rounded) of the total value of 1 Altria and .692024
Kraft, so its new basis should be 75% of your original $77 basis, or $57.75
per share. That fractional share of Kraft would be worth the other 25%, or
$19.25. The total new basis is $57.75 + $19.25 = $77.00, the same as your
original basis. To get the basis of a full share of Kraft, divide $19.25 by
the .692024 fraction = $27.82 (rounded).

If you had 100 shares of Altria at a total basis of $7,700.00, you should
now have:
100 shares of Altria at a basis of $57.75 per share = $5,775.00, plus
69.2024 shares of Kraft at a basis of $27.82 per share = $1,925.00
(rounded),
for a total adjusted basis of $7,700.00

You would immediately sell the .2024 fractional share of Kraft at $31.66 per
share and receive a check for $6.41. Deduct your basis for that fractional
share (.2024 * $27.82 = $5.63) and you have a $0.78 capital gain. This will
leave you with 69 shares of Kraft with a basis of $27.82 per share. Your
total basis for Altria and Kraft will now be $7,700 - $5.63 = $7,694.37.

When I poked these numbers (65.90 and 31.66) into Quicken 2007 Basic, I got
adjusted bases of $5,778.76 for 100 Altria and $1,921.24 for 69.2024 Kraft.
On the Transactions tab, there is a Return of Capital for Altria and a
Bought for Kraft, each in the amount of $1,921.24. On the Summary or
Portfolio page, the total bases are shown, but not the per-share basis.

I don't know why you got different bases. Try it again and see what you
get.

RC
--
R. C. White, CPA
San Marcos, TX
(Retired. No longer licensed to practice public accounting.)
rc@grandecom.net
Microsoft Windows MVP
(Currently running Vista Ultimate x64)

> RC,
>
> You explained that well. And I beleive you are current in all your
> statement. I understand how to compute this on paper but i'm having
> troubling inputing this into Quicken.
>
> Can you please tell me what I'm doing wrong??? I'm entering the
> following information:
>
> New shares issued = 0.692024 per old share
>
> Cost per old share = 65.90 post spinoff
>
> Cost per new share = 31.66 post spinoff
>
> It seems like I am getting the correct new shares number for Kraft.
> The problem is the new cost basis of both securities. Altria is coming
> up with 77 (which is was my cost basis pre-spin off before
> commissions) and Kraft is coming up with 27.95. At the end of the
> transaction shouldn't Altria be 65.90 and Kraft be 31.66?
> What am I missing?
>
> Altria post an example on how to compute the values.
> http://www.altria.com/investors/02_20_02_example.asp
>
> Thanks for any help.
> AA
>
>> Hi, GB.
>>
>> Step 1, of course, is to understand what happened in the real world.
>> News
>> reports usually tell us, but often leave out some important details. The
>> best place to get the information is usually from the parent company.
>> Nowadays, we can just go to their website and click on something like
>> Investor Relations.
>>
>> In this case, the parent is NOT Philip Morris, but PM's parent, Altria.
>> A
>> little searching found:
>> Kraft Spin-Off Investor
>> Informationhttp://www.altria.com/investors/02_20_00_spinoffinvinfo.asp
>>
>> The link there took me to the page we really want:
>> Kraft Spin-Off Investor
>> Informationhttp://kraft.com/investors/kraft_spin_off.html
>>
>> But the spin-off did not happen in 2006. To quote:: "The distribution
>> of
>> Kraft's outstanding shares owned by Altria was made on March 30, 2007, to
>> Altria shareholders of record as of 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on March 16,
>> 2007." Then the Kraft page refers us back to the Altria page for
>> details,
>> where we see, "Altria will distribute 0.692024 of a share of Kraft for
>> every
>> share of Altria common stock outstanding as of the Record Date,..."
>>
>> Step 2 is to record what actually happened in Step 1.
>>
>> In Quicken 2007, click Enter Transaction and choose Corporate Securities
>> Spin-Off. The transaction date is 3/30/07. Security name is Altria
>> Group,
>> Inc.. The new company is Kraft, Inc. New shares issued is 0.692024 (of
>> Kraft) per old share (of Altria). And leave blank the "taxable spinoff"
>> box; Altria says it qualifies as tax-free. You may want to make some
>> notations in the Memo box.
>>
>> But that is as far as we can go until we get two more bits of
>> information:
>> the Fair Market Values of Altria and Kraft immediately AFTER the
>> spin-off.
>> Quicken asks for the "Cost" of the old and new shares, but that is not
>> correct. When we know the FMVs of the shares, Quicken can then calculate
>> the new bases (cost) of the old and new shares, based on the ratio of
>> those
>> values, applied to your adjusted basis in Altria. Quicken will adjust
>> the
>> basis for all the lots of Altria that you owned, and will record the
>> basis
>> of matching lots of Kraft, and will show the acquisition dates for each
>> lot
>> as of the dates you acquired the matching lots of Altria. (This will
>> have
>> the unfortunate effect of showing that you owned Kraft shares before
>> 3/30/07, which is wrong, of course; we haven't figured out a good way to
>> fix
>> this, and neither has Intuit, apparently.)
>>
>> The actual spin-off date was just a couple of days ago. Within a very
>> few
>> days, Altria should determine and publish their opinion as to the FMVs of
>> Altria and Kraft for shareholders to use in the calculation. (FMV is a
>> matter of opinion and you are free to argue for different numbers, but it
>> rarely is worth the trouble.)
>>
>> You probably will be entitled to a fractional share of Kraft and will
>> receive cash in lieu of that fraction. Immediately after recording the
>> spin-off, you should record the sale of this fraction for the amount of
>> the
>> check you will receive. Use the per-share basis that Quicken has just
>> calculated and your Altria acquisition date; Quicken should handle this
>> for
>> you automatically.
>>
>> For further information, watch the Altria and Kraft web pages.
>>
>> I've been retired for over a dozen years and tax rules change daily, GB.
>> Be
>> sure to check with your own CPA to be sure that my understanding is still
>> correct.
>>
>> RC
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Hello
>>
>> > Why do Quicken software "Engineers" make a simple thing, so damm
>> > hard????
>>
>> > I am trying to do a corporate spin off of Kraft from Philip Morris
>> > [MO],
>> > the spin off option in the drop down menu under action for a new
>> > transaction [Q2006] does not work correctly [the number of shares and
>> > price are not correct]
>>
>> > Maybe I am entering the wrong information? What numbers are they asking
>> > for in the boxes under the "spin off" action?
>>
>> > What I ended up doing is creating a "buy shares" option under action,
>> > this makes the numbers come out correct.
>>
>> > Thanks everyone
>> > GB


Posted by dllapides on April 4, 2007, 10:38 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Step 1, of course, is to understand what happened in the real world.
>
> Step 2 is to record what actually happened in Step 1.
>
> But that is as far as we can go until we get two more bits of information:
> the Fair Market Values of Altria and Kraft immediately AFTER the spin-off.
> Quicken
will adjust the
> basis for all the lots of Altria that you owned, and will record the basis
> of matching lots of Kraft, and will show the acquisition dates for each lot
> as of the dates you acquired the matching lots of Altria. (This will have
> the unfortunate effect of showing that you owned Kraft shares before
> 3/30/07, which is wrong, of course; we haven't figured out a good way to fix
> this, and neither has Intuit, apparently.)

As an old Quicken user, and follower of this group, this issue comes
up constantly. Think AT&T.

Quicken's share for share acquisition has the identical issue, which I
have found works much better for corporate name changes, such as
Philip Morris becoming Altria Group back in 2003. (If you use
"corporate name change, it changes (or did in Q2004) the name all the
way back. But I like my reports to show Philip Morris through 2003,
and then Altria. Doing a 1 share for 1 share acquisition transaction
preserves the basis, and name change date.

>
> The actual spin-off date was just a couple of days ago. Within a very few
> days, Altria should determine and publish their opinion as to the FMVs of
> Altria and Kraft for shareholders to use in the calculation. (FMV is a
> matter of opinion and you are free to argue for different numbers, but it
> rarely is worth the trouble.)

Altria posted a Shareholder Tax Basis information sheet today. They
used closing prices on 4/2 for FMV. I'm not sure I agree, but its not
worth the headache of ever having to deal with the issue.

With the information sheet in hand, I tried the Quicken Spin Off
transaction method, and it generated a Kraft acquisition date that was
the same as my old Philip Morris purchase date. I don't recall when
PM purchased Kraft, but Philip Morris (as it then was) sold off 11% of
the Kraft stock in June 2001. SEE KRAFT 10-K: Thus, the Quicken
method will generate incorrect reports during the 2001-2007 period.

As an alternative, I tried the Quicken Return of Capital transaction
to reduce my Altria basis, and the Add Shares transaction which let's
me include both my allocable Kraft basis (which is the same as my
Altria return of capital) and assign my PM acquisition date to the
Kraft shares. This has the advantage of accurate rerports of my
holdings or net worth. It also has the DISadvantage of including the
Return of Capital as cash in the account. A Miscellaneous Expense for
"Fudge Factor" takes care of that.

It isn't pretty. But I think it works. (And if it doesn't, I look
forward for your always elegant explanation). Next, i need to deal
with my fractional share cash-out, and then on to my 401(k) where I've
used its dividend reinvestment option.

ONE LAST POINT -- the folks who provide the stock quotes to Quicken
have edited all of last weeks quotes to reflect the WI (when issued)
quotes. I was expecting the Friday 3/30/07 quote to get changed, but
they changed the entire week !!
I only discovered this because I dated my transaction as Saturday
3/31/07, and needed to erase the bogus 3/31/07 stock price value.

Keep up the great explanations.

-dllapides




Posted by John Pollard on April 5, 2007, 8:49 am
Please log in for more thread options
dllapides wrote:

> Altria posted a Shareholder Tax Basis information sheet
> today. They used closing prices on 4/2 for FMV. I'm not
> sure I agree, but its not worth the headache of ever
> having to deal with the issue.
>
> With the information sheet in hand, I tried the Quicken
> Spin Off transaction method, and it generated a Kraft
> acquisition date that was the same as my old Philip
> Morris purchase date. I don't recall when PM purchased
> Kraft, but Philip Morris (as it then was) sold off 11% of
> the Kraft stock in June 2001. SEE KRAFT 10-K: Thus, the
> Quicken method will generate incorrect reports during the
> 2001-2007 period.
>
> As an alternative, I tried the Quicken Return of Capital
> transaction to reduce my Altria basis, and the Add Shares
> transaction which let's me include both my allocable
> Kraft basis (which is the same as my Altria return of
> capital) and assign my PM acquisition date to the Kraft
> shares. This has the advantage of accurate rerports of
> my holdings or net worth.

> It also has the DISadvantage
> of including the Return of Capital as cash in the
> account. A Miscellaneous Expense for "Fudge Factor"
> takes care of that.

You don't need the extra MiscExp transaction; just modify the
Return of Capital transaction to "transfer" the cash back into
the investment account itself.

--
John Pollard
First initial underscore Last name at mchsi dot com
Please reply to newsgroup



Posted by dllapides on April 5, 2007, 8:54 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> > As an alternative, I tried the Quicken Return of Capital
> > transaction to reduce my Altria basis, and the Add Shares
> > transaction which let's me include both my allocable
> > Kraft basis (which is the same as my Altria return of
> > capital) and assign my PM acquisition date to the Kraft
> > shares. This has the advantage of accurate rerports of
> > my holdings or net worth.
> > It also has the DISadvantage
> > of including the Return of Capital as cash in the
> > account. A Miscellaneous Expense for "Fudge Factor"
> > takes care of that.
>
> You don't need the extra MiscExp transaction; just modify the
> Return of Capital transaction to "transfer" the cash back into
> the investment account itself.
>
> --
> John Pollard
> First initial underscore Last name at mchsi dot com
> Please reply to newsgroup- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -


Thanx--

As much as I like including a fudge factor <grin>, your suggestion
does the trick.

-dllapides


Posted by dllapides on April 6, 2007, 11:41 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>
> > You don't need the extra MiscExp transaction; just modify the
> > Return of Capital transaction to "transfer" the cash back into
> > the investment account itself.
>
> > --
> > John Pollard
> > First initial underscore Last name at mchsi dot com
> > Please reply to newsgroup- Hide quoted text -
>
John--

Your suggestion worked for my Altria holdings held in my plain vanilla
brokerage account.

But the "Return of Capital -- Transfer" transaction is NOT available
for IRA accounts. (I also hold Altria in an IRA rollover account from
an old 401(k).)

But the "Cash Withdrawal" transaction allows a transfer to itself
("WithdrwX") and eliminates the cash balance created from my Return of
Capital. I get to use Fudge after all. <grin>

-dllapides


Similar ThreadsPosted
Corporate Securities Spin-off January 8, 2007, 9:15 pm
Corporate Acquisition December 2, 2006, 6:54 pm
corporate spinoffs February 27, 2007, 7:22 pm
Corporate Spinoffs March 8, 2007, 8:53 pm
Corporate name change April 3, 2008, 12:21 am
spin off April 7, 2008, 7:30 pm
Corporate Securities Spinoff April 22, 2007, 1:48 pm
Corporate Payments (H&B2007) May 5, 2007, 6:13 pm
Verizon spin-off December 13, 2006, 5:26 pm
Spectra spin-off January 4, 2007, 5:17 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap