|
Posted by Jay Levitt on October 27, 2006, 4:18 pm
Please log in for more thread options On 26 Oct 2006 19:26:48 -0700, TomYoung wrote:
> As a matter of tax law - of which I'm no expert - I think you could
> claim 90% of the loss since 10/100 = 10%.
I did not realize that! I was reading the fairmark.com guide to wash sales
instead of the actual IRS pub, and they never deal with the case where the
lots are different sizes. Argh. Thanks for pointing that big mistake out.
> However, we'll stick with
> your premise that the full $25 has to be added to the basis of the
> 3/15/05 purchase.
>
> I did it this way:
>
> Left the 1/1/05 Buy and 3/1/05 Sale alone.
>
> Entered an ABC stock RtrnCapX transaction between the Buy and Sell
> dates for $25.
> (Doesn't affect cash, results in no gain/loss on 3/1/05 which is the
> situation for tax purposes, if not GAAP purposes.)
Makes sense. I'm just editing the Schedule D output manually in Excel,
which accomplishes the same thing for tax purposes.
> Added the 10 shares of ABC @ $10/sh on 3/15/05 with a lot date of
> 1/1/05
>
> Entered an ABC stock RtrnCapX transaction on 3/15/05 for ($25).
> (Doesn't affect cash, adds to $100 actual cost basis of new 10 shares.)
Ah! Right, that RtrnCap needs to be negative. I discovered that when I
found that selling a lot with a negative cost basis does verrry interesting
things in Quicken.
> Did an XOut transaction of $100 on 3/15/05.
> (Gets cash in account correct for 3/15/05 purchase, doesn't show up on
> a Income/Expense report.)
Perfect. I'll use XOut instead of MiscExp, which (turns out) affects the
cost basis.
And yes, I'm commenting heavily on each of these, plus saving the Excel
file which contains a list of wash sales...
Thanks a bunch for the pointers.
Jay
|