|
Posted by Jeff@unknown.com on July 1, 2008, 7:37 pm
Please log in for more thread options Yes, you both have been helpful.
I just got used to the older way where the Find window stayed visible. True
it sometimes got in the way (depended where you moved it to) but had the
advantage that it only took just one mouse click on "Next" to find the next
one. On my Windows XP system "Find ALL" always crashed Quicken 2006 and I
therefore could not use it. They seem to have finally fixed that bug in Q
2008 and I will therefore "find all" that more usable.
Different strokes for different folks. Allowing the option to chose if the
Find window minimizes or not would have allowed both groups to be happy.
Thanks for the help.
Jeff
John Pollard wrote:
> Jerry Boyle wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>> That would be a "Find All"; a "Find" always finds in the
>>> "current"
>>> register, and doesn't produce "search results". Sorry I
>>> didn't make
>>> clear that I believed that the op was doing a "Find", not a
>>> "Find
>>> All".
>>
>> You're absolutely right, I completely misinterpreted the
>> question.
>> It's only by accident that my answer was almost right :-)
>
> After re-reading the thread, I'm not so sure you misinterpreted
> anything.
>
> In any event, I'm still not really sure exactly what the op was
> doing ... but I do think that between the two of us we have
> possibly provided some helpful repsonses.
>
> Frankly, I had not spent enough time looking at the ways that
> Find/Find All/Search worked until you made your point.
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap