|
Posted by Arnie Goetchius on August 2, 2006, 9:03 am
Please log in for more thread options John Pollard wrote:
>
>> With Q2006, the "Yield on Investment" is almost identical to
>> "Dividend Yield" for one of my stocks which has gained
>> substantially. For example:
>>
>> The stock was purchased for $23,450 in December '05 with
>> annual dividends of $1300 for a "Dividend Yield" of 5.5% at
>> the time of purchase. Today the stock is worth $28,400 and
>> with the same dividend, the "Dividend Yield" is 4.6%. It
>> appears that "Dividend Yield" uses dividends/current market
>> price x 100 to calculate 4.6%
>>
>> I would have thought that the "Yield on Investment" would stay
>> at 5.5% based on the original investment cost. However, the
>> "Yield on Investment" shows 4.8%. I don't understand how
>> Quicken makes that calculation and why it doesn't come out as
>> 5.5%. Does quicken adjust the cost basis for some reason -
>> inflation maybe?
>
> For answers to questions such as the one posed in your subject,
> I think the first place to look is in the "Glossary" on the menu
> bar on the Portfolio tab.
>
> One problem with your question, as stated, is that Quicken has
> no such value as "Yield on Investment". There is "Yield on
> investment (%)" or "Yield on investment (Estimated"; but no
> "Yield on investment".
>
> According to the Q2006 glossary:
>
> "Yield on investment (%) equals: Income per share divided by
> current market price per share."
>
> and the definition of "Yield on investment (estimated)" is
>
> "... the estimated income (specified by you in the Edit Security
> dialog) divided by the dollar amount you invested (excluding
> reinvestments)."
Sorry I wasn't more precise. "Yield on investment (estimated)" is the
one with which I'm having a problem. After going through the Edit
Security dialog and setting the estimated income, Quicken gives me a
figure of 2.94%. As stated above, the cost in December 05 was $23,450
and the yield is set to $1300 which gives a Yield on Investment
(estimated) of 5.54% by my calculation. This is a substantial difference
from the figure provided by Quicken.
>
> The definitions appear to be exactly the same in Q2005.
>
|