|
Posted by John Pollard on February 1, 2007, 7:26 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Ron wrote:
> I have a question relating to categorization of
> investment transactions.
> In a taxable investment account, I have a Fidelity MM
430 No such article
Ron wrote:
> I have a question relating to categorization of
> investment transactions.
> In a taxable investment account, I have a Fidelity MM
> fund whose dividends are federal and state tax exempt. I
> have ticked the "tax free" status for the fund under
> "edit security." I download the data from Fidelity. I
> use Q2005 Premier under WinXP.
> Each transaction shows up in reports categorized as
> _DivInc. I'd have expected _DivIncTaxFree. Have I
> missed something? There is no way to manually categorize
> a transaction in an investment account, AFAIK. Is there
> a way to force the correct categorization on download, or
> to recategorize existing entries?
All of your dividends are "income"; some of them are tax free
and some are not.
Quicken separates the tax free income from the taxable income
where it is appropriate ... but Quicken does not do so based on
"category" alone.
If you look at a banking "Transaction" report that is not
subtotalled, all dividends have a category of "_DivInc". If you
subtotal that report on "Category", you will see your tax free
dividends reported in the "_DivIncTaxFree" category group ...
while their transaction category remains "_DivInc".
If you run an Income/Expense report, you will see your tax free
income reported in separate "tax free" categories from your
non-tax-free income.
If you run tax reports, you will not see your tax free income
reported at all.
Quicken does not rely solely on the "category" field to
determine the taxable nature of a transaction. Quicken uses
other information, such as the tax-free characteristic of a
security, or the tax-deferred nature of a Quicken account, to
determine whether your income is "taxable". But all that income
is still "income".
--
John Pollard
First initial underscore Last name at mchsi dot com
Please reply to newsgroup
|