|
Posted by Merrily on July 19, 2007, 1:40 pm
Please log in for more thread options Yes, you understand correctly, and thanks for your suggestion. It sounds
like a good idea and one I hadn't thought of. Will try to implement it soon.
> Merrily:
>
> Am I understanding you correctly that in ONE investment account, the cash
> value in "Summary" differs from "Transactions?"
>
> If it were I, and my MAIN concern were the cash balance in an investment
> account, I WOULD keep a separate linked checking account to keep track of
> cash.
>
> You may want to experiment by copying your current file to a TEST or TRIAL
> file, and play around with that file.
>
> By separating out the cash transactions into a checking account, it should
> be easier to determine where or when the numbers diverged.
>
> Bob
>
>>>>
> Since no one has replied to my question, I am probably 'talking to
> myself.'
> However, just in case, someone is listenting, here is an update.
>
> I undertook another approach to trying to solve the discrepancy between
> cash
> in the portfolito view and cash in the transaction view. I put various
> dates
> into the portfolio view, checked what amount of cash was displayed and
> then
> checked what the transactions view showed as cash. By a process of
> elimination (jumping from an end of December date in one year to a similar
> date in the next year going back to 2000 or thereabouts which was about
> when
> I started tracking the investment/brokerage account), I narrowed down most
> of the discrepancy to a series of transactions in 2005 over a period of
> about a month. At least that is when the cash shown in the portfolio for a
> date is not the same as the cash in the transactions balance. I tried to
> re-enter those transactions (albeit without deleting the originals first)
> and the problem was not corrected. I then did a validation procedure and
> it
> did not fix it. I also changed one money fund back to being a security
> before the validation. I also looked at the Help in Quicken some more and
> I
> cannot find anything that would help me. Does anyone have any suggestions?
>
>>I upgraded to Quicken 2007 from Q2004 a few months ago. A problem I had in
>>Q2004 and never resolved has persisted - not unexpectedly. However, I have
>>now decided I would like to fix it and I cannot seem to figure out the
>>best, i.e., quickest way. And maybe it is not fixable now, but I hope it
>>is.
>>
>> The problem goes back some years, I'm not sure how many. I think there
>> are
>> two parts to the problem.
>>
>> 1. I had an investment account with a linked cash or bank account. At
>> some
>> point, probably when I updated to Quicken 2004 from an earlier version,
>> the directions indicated that it was better not to continue with the
>> 'linked' account set-up and I followed the directions. For a time I had
>> the link information available but it wasn't linked. As the years went on
>> and I did end-of-year archiving, the linked account archived, I think. I
>> can find some of the transactions in archived accounts.
>> Meanwhile, my investment account cash balance reconciles but only after I
>> add some adjustments from time to time. These adjustments appear to tie
>> in
>> with checks drawn and other entries recorded in the missing linked
>> account. Moreover, the cash amount in the portfolio display is way out of
>> sync.
>>
>> 2. In addition, I have one investment in a kind of money fund (not the
>> account cash) that Quicken wants to treat as cash, so that makes two cash
>> holdings to my way of thinking. Moreover, the investment that Quicken
>> wants to treat as cash, also shows up as shares, because that's the way
>> it
>> was set up originally. All the interest is recorded in the security as
>> reinvested dividends. Recently, I clicked on the highlighted cash in the
>> portfolio and followed the recommendation to consider the 'money fund
>> investment' as cash. This did not affect the cash balance showing in the
>> transactions display, a may have slightly affected the cash balance in
>> the
>> portfolio but it didn't make any more sense to me.
>>
>> How can I fix all of this?
>>
>> Merrily
>>
>
>
>
|