|
Posted by Andrew on January 2, 2008, 8:26 pm
Please log in for more thread options John Pollard wrote:
> lanman wrote:
>
>> Nevertheless, I set the date on the report back to 12/30 when
>> I
>> originally reconciled, and it didn't work. The numbers and
>> items
>> changed and apparently included transactions entered after the
>> 12/30
>> reconciliation.
>
>> Is there a way to get a report which mirrors the one done on
>> 12/30?
>
> I think not, if you've changed the account register since the
> reconcile.
>
> If you have the report include all transactions, it's going to
> include transactions not reconciled ... even the report run as
> part of the reconcile process does that. If you have added
> transactions to the account since you reconciled, they're going
> to appear in the reconciliation report.
>
> [I don't use the report, so I have not taken the time to verify
> in detail, the validity of a recon report for an account that
> has had transactions added/modified since the reconcile. But a
> quick glance suggests the report may be "correct", even though
> not what would have printed at the conclusion of the reconcile.
> If - a big if - the only difference is in the "uncleared
> transactions", I don't know why the report wouldn't suffice.]
>
> To see the exact same report that would have printed at the
> conclusion of reconciling, restore a backup, from just following
> the reconcile, to a temporary folder, and print the recon report
> from there.
Ah, I see what you mean John - the OP did say "mirror the one done on
12/30,". But, what I mean (and what I think he might mean but I could be
misunderstanding his true intent) is to verify that his Quicken account
reconciles as to the 12/30 bank statement. It is true, as you say, he may
have transactions added since the original 12/30. But that should not
negate the intent of his balancing to the 12/30 statement, unless he ALSO
wishes to see 'uncleared' transactions exactly as they might have been at
that point too, right? And since he did say he's using H&B, that might be
what he needs for auditing purposes. Not sure.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
Regards -
- Andrew
|