|
Posted by Jan Groshan on August 26, 2007, 6:06 pm
Please log in for more thread options Isn't the whole purpose of split transactions exactly what the original
poster is talking about? If you make a single deposit in the register, but
use the "split" feature to list the individual payors/checks, matching the
downloaded information with the register information is no problem, and if
you want to know if John Jones paid his bill every month, just run a
transaction report .... provided you've listed John Jones in either the memo
or category for each deposit. This system has worked for me for years.
>> >
>>> When you use "Manual match" to match one downloaded transaction
>>> to multiple existing register transactions, Quicken creates a
>>> new register transaction that is a split of all the pre-existing
>>> register transactions that you told Quicken to match to ... with
>>> the payee names in the memo field of the split lines.
>
>> Is there no way to have Quicken manually reconcile these "individual"
>> transaction as "individual transactions and NOT lump them into one
>> split transaction?
>
> No. JM's approach is the best one I know of.
>
> An alternative is to supply one deposit ticket for each check; generally
> the bank will create individual deposit transactions for each deposit
> ticket. Though you should ask them beforehand.
>
>
> --
> John Pollard
> First initial underscore Last name at mchsi dot com
> Please reply to newsgroup
>
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap