Home Page link  

Q2007 - Roth IRA Gain/Loss Calculation

 

Quicken Personal Finance Discussions - Quicken - personal finance software discussions 

get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Q2007 - Roth IRA Gain/Loss Calculation Dunbar 04-24-2007
Posted by Dunbar on April 24, 2007, 1:30 am
Please log in for more thread options
I just loaded all of the info for my Roth IRA in Quicken 2007 Deluxe. It
looks like it is ignoring the dividends and capital gains that go reinvested
into the same fund for the gain/loss calucation. This obviously reduces the
apparent gain in the value of the fund(s). The cost basis gets increased
with the reinvestments but I still think gain should be calcluation by
subtracting current value by original purchase price. Am I wrong in my
thinking?


Posted by John Pollard on April 24, 2007, 9:49 am
Please log in for more thread options
Dunbar wrote:
> I just loaded all of the info for my Roth IRA in Quicken
> 2007 Deluxe. It looks like it is ignoring the dividends
> and capital gains that go reinvested into the same fund
> for the gain/loss calucation. This obviously reduces the
> apparent gain in the value of the fund(s).

> The cost basis gets increased with the reinvestments

That's how Quicken does it and that's the way it should be done.

It's no different than if a dividend check was mailed to you,
and you used the dividend check to purchase more shares of the
security. A reinvestment is really a Dividend plus a Buy.

> but I still think
> gain should be calcluation by subtracting current value
> by original purchase price. Am I wrong in my thinking?

You should check the Quicken "Glossary" (and follow up any
links/references to other Quicken Help) for the definitions of
the various "return" values that Quicken can display. Amount
"invested" and amount "reinvested" can play different roles in
different return calculations.

--
John Pollard
First initial underscore Last name at mchsi dot com
Please reply to newsgroup



Posted by MMGilbert on April 28, 2007, 12:22 am
Please log in for more thread options
Well, John is certainly correct as to how Quicken does it, and if he
thinks its the way it should be, that's ok too. However, I've taken
the approach that (in a IRA?401(k) type of account) you only care
about gain - no matter whether it's appreciation or dividends paid.
Why? Simply because there is no tax consequences (different) and so
there is no concept of "increasing your cost basis."

So how do I handle it - very simply by letting the new shares show up
in the account as reinvested dividends or whatever, but set the cost
of those shares to $0. Then you track the growth of the fund without
the cost basis increasing over what "you" invested into the IRA, etc.
Works for me.


Similar ThreadsPosted
Turbotax - Undocumented calculation April 16, 2006, 10:56 am
stock price calculation April 1, 2009, 3:15 am
Calculation Errors in Transaction Repports May 24, 2006, 10:06 pm
State Tax Calculation - Quicken Premier 2007 May 17, 2007, 10:32 am
Home page Cash Flow calculation June 4, 2007, 10:47 pm
Quicken calculation of loan principal/interest allocation July 13, 2006, 12:58 am
Average Annualized return calculation in quicken premiere 2007 January 8, 2007, 5:19 pm
Roth 401k October 3, 2006, 12:51 pm
Converting IRA to Roth IRA January 2, 2007, 5:47 pm
Roth with Traditional 401(k) July 8, 2009, 12:57 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap