|
Posted by Rick Hess on October 13, 2006, 11:41 am
Please log in for more thread options Thanks for the comments, R. C. and DP.
And R. C., I don't get to "play" here as much these days since I'm still
deep into Katrina insurance claims, attorneys and, lately, my income tax
return preparation (which is due much later for Katrina victims). But I
lurk every few weeks and enjoy keeping up with the group.
--
Rick Hess
New Orleans
To email, eliminate All_Spammers
> Hi, Rick.
>
> We haven't seen as much of you since Katrina. I'm glad to see that you
> survived and are back!
>
> Yes, there have been compatibility problems with 64-bit Windows and Vista.
> :>(
>
> But none of those have affected Quicken - in MY experience. ;<)
>
> Of course, we all use Quicken differently. I seldom print anything from
> Quicken. Nobody but me sees any of my Quicken output, so I just read it
> onscreen. I have only one computer and no network. You may see problems
in
> YOUR use of Quicken that don't bother me at all.
>
> My only printer is an HP OfficeJet G55 All-In-One, which I bought in
2000 -
> then had to wait TWO YEARS for HP to produce full-featured drivers for
> Windows 2000. WinXP had functional drivers built in, and so does Vista,
> both 32-bit and 64-bit. Note that there is a difference between DRIVERS,
> which let the hardware function with the operating system to print and
scan,
> versus the fancy applications PROGRAMS that HP produces to do fancy
> brochures and such to show off all the many features of their hardware.
> Most of the extra functions (OCR, etc.) in those apps are also available
in
> other apps, such as MS Office, anyhow. And, of course, the copier
functions
> of my G55 work without even being hooked to the computer.
>
> IHV's (Independent Hardware Vendors) have been caught in the "chicken/egg"
> and "moving target" binds. Why spend money to produce 64-bit drivers
before
> the market is ready to buy them? And why develop a driver to fit Vista
beta
> build 5112 when build 5600 may be different - and the final Vista may be
> more different?
>
> Currently, I'm still suffering compatibility problems with Vista, but they
> involve applications like Nero and Adobe Photoshop Elements, not Quicken,
> which has given me no significant compatibility problems with either WinXP
> x64 or either version of Vista. As I said, the Q2007 Basic install was
the
> quickest and easiest yet, into the 32-bit versions of both WinXP and Vista
> and into the 64-bit version of Vista.
>
> RC
> --
> R. C. White, CPA
> San Marcos, TX
> (Retired. No longer licensed to practice public accounting.)
> rc@grandecom.net
> Microsoft Windows MVP
> (Currently running Vista x86 build 5744 RC2)
>
> >
> > (snip)
> >> Each operating system (both x86 and x64 versions of WinXP
> >
> > (snip)
> >> But they
> >> all run Quicken
> > (snip)
> >
> >
> > Hi R. C.
> >
> > Have you had many problems with x64 (compatibility, drivers, etc.)?
There
> > were a few posts regarding printing issues with Q in x64...
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Rick Hess
> > New Orleans
>
|