|
Posted by Laura on February 7, 2008, 9:07 pm
Please log in for more thread options Q also does not give you the same level of detail the 1099 shows. My
interest is broken down into taxable, non taxable, foreign sources and a few
other categories. I don't think we have any other choice but to use the 1099
form as that is the official number reported to the IRS.
> "And even if Q differs from the 1099, what do you expect to do about
> it???"
>
> In all my cases over the years, I made a mistake in my entry in Quicken.
> I fix Quicken. If my 1099 was wrong (I have yet to find one), I would use
> the Quicken number only if I was sure that it was correct.
>
> Oilcan
>
>
>> Laura wrote:
>>> So this is another reason to use the 1099 instead of the totals from Q.
>>
>> Let me go one step further. IMNSHO, there is virtually NEVER a reason to
>> use Quicken vs. a 1099 !
>> The 1099 figures are what the IRS receives; in 99% (and only because I'm
>> leaving myself an out) they could give a Rat's a*s what Quicken sez on an
>> import!
>>
>> I always find it amusing to try to understand what people are thinking
>> trying to export Quicken data to Turbotax without ensuring what ends up
>> is simply what is easily obtainable (and needs to be used) on a 1099.
>> And even if Q differs from the 1099, what do you expect to do about it???
>>
>> (In fact, movement is now afoot to have FIs calculate AND REPORT cost
>> basis to the IRS for 1099-B reportable sales. Yet another reason to not
>> trust Quicken, although there are more than one way to calculate cost
>> basis that is indeed legit and probably doesn't match reported 1099-B
>> cost basis figures if this ever comes to pass.)
>>
>> I'm listening to see if I'm mistaken - all suggestive comments welcomed!
>> --
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> Regards -
>>
>> - Andrew
>>
>
|