|
Posted by second1 on February 24, 2007, 12:34 pm
Please log in for more thread options I'm a long term Money user, currently employing MS2007. Late last
year I went so far as to purchase Q2007. After using both in parallel
for a while, I've gone back to Money mainly because Quicken does not
incorporate scheduled bill payments into the budget; instead you have
to manually reinter them or have Quicken generate a budget from your
actuals, but I don't like the inaccuracies of that approach.
>
>
>After five years using MS Money, I switched to Quicken late last year,
>mostly because the billpaying and other online functions are important
>to me, and I find Quicken's more flexible and better integrated than
>Money's. (For example, downloading data from the two banks where I
>have accounts was clunky and prone to error in Money. Quicken works
>much better for me. And Quicken's online billpaying service
>integrates better with the check register than Money's does.) Both
>do most things about equally well. Neither provides very good tech
>support, so you're better off coming to groups like this one if you
>need advice on how to do things or solve problems. I'm happy with
>Quicken, and plan to stay with it. But each program has its own look
>and feel, and ideally you'd play with each to get a feel of which you
>like best.
I'm a long term Money user, currently employing MS2007. Late last
year I went so far as to purchase Q2007. After using both in parallel
for a while, I've gone back to Money mainly because Quicken does not
incorporate scheduled bill payments into the budget; instead you have
to manually reinter them or have Quicken generate a budget from your
actuals, but I don't like the inaccuracies of that approach.
>
>
>After five years using MS Money, I switched to Quicken late last year,
>mostly because the billpaying and other online functions are important
>to me, and I find Quicken's more flexible and better integrated than
>Money's. (For example, downloading data from the two banks where I
>have accounts was clunky and prone to error in Money. Quicken works
>much better for me. And Quicken's online billpaying service
>integrates better with the check register than Money's does.) Both
>do most things about equally well. Neither provides very good tech
>support, so you're better off coming to groups like this one if you
>need advice on how to do things or solve problems. I'm happy with
>Quicken, and plan to stay with it. But each program has its own look
>and feel, and ideally you'd play with each to get a feel of which you
>like best.
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap