|
Posted by Pam on January 21, 2008, 1:17 pm
Please log in for more thread options > I would hold off. =A0By next year you might have a Vista machine and I wou=
ld
e
>
>
>
>
> > Han wrote:
> >> @newsfe19.lga:
>
> >>> I am presently using Quicken Deluxe 2006 and therefore do not need to
> >>> upgrade till next year. =A0Would there be any advantage (features,
> >>> bugs, etc.) in upgrading to QD 2008 this year rather than wait till
> >>> I am forced to next year?
>
> >>> (My computer uses XP not Vista).
>
> >>> Jeff
>
> >> That depends on how badly you need whatever is really new in 08. =A0Not=
> >> much, if you ask me, but marketing got me to believe I needed 08 for
> >> my Vista (ugh) laptop.
>
> >> Bottom line: =A0If you are satisfied wit 06, keep using it until it
> >> really stops working. =A0Even then, as discussed in other threads,
> >> netstock appears a very good workaround for the deficient stock price
> >> downloads in Quicken, and most FI's may (??) let you download data
> >> for older Quicken versions (I amd not sure of that).
>
> > That was precisely how I felt about it. =A0I plan to wait till next year=
> > before deciding but thought to solicit opinions in case there were thing=
s
> > I did not know about. =A0It does not seem like QD 2008 has any "must hav=
e"
> > advantages over continuing with QD 2006.
>
> > Jeff- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I just upgraded from 2001 to 2008. I am sorry I ever did. BTW 2001
runs on Vista as well.
|