|
Posted by norm on February 25, 2008, 1:52 am
Please log in for more thread options
PortStG@nospam.invalid wrote:
> Stevey wrote
>>> I've been using Q'99 ever since it came out and it's doing the job
>>> just fine, thank you, even on Vista.
>
> Han wrote:
>> I have generally been upgrading every other year. For me that is the
>> sweet spot between totally up-to-date and very frugal.
>
> I would have prefered to stay current but only with an equal or
> improved product. I like simple and efficient versus colorful with
> graphics. And I'm not very frugal when it comes to software that I
> find improved. I haven't seen improvements that'll benefit me though.
> In fact, the reverse is true for things like the Register view. Q98
> puts 50% more transaction lines on my screen than Q2008. That's a big
> difference in a feature that's important to me. To someone else, the
> Register may not be important at all. On the other hand, Q2008 has
> features that are apparently important to other people but are totally
> lost on me.
>
> Anyhow, thanks for the conversation ;-)
>
> Laters ;-)
> Port
If you just want to put more transactions on the screen at one time you
can consider using the "one line display" option,which eliminates the
MEMO field. At least, this works in Q07.
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap