|
Posted by John Pollard on May 9, 2008, 9:36 am
Please log in for more thread options Bernie Cosell wrote:
> Thanks! Turns out that the report is called a "Transaction
> Report" in
> Q2006 and it is a bit of an odd duck [which is, perhaps, why I
> didn't
> notice its treasurer-ness before..:o)]: If you tell it NOT to
> group
> the transactions at all, you do, in fact, get a "treasurer's
> report":
> starting balance, ending balance and the transactions listed
> in
> chronological order. BUT: if you tell it to do ANY sort of
> grouping,
> then the treasurer-ness goes away [e.g., I tried to get the
> transactions groups by category instead of chronological, but
> that
> doesn't just change the order of listing/grouping, it changes
> the
> entire report].
I find that in Q2008, I can "group" transactions by using any of
the "Sort by" choices without losing the balance forward and
ending balance.
I can also keep the balance-forward/ending-balance when I
"Subtotal by" a "period" (like "Month").
Only when I use the "Subtotal by" with non-date type choices
(like Category or Payee) do I lose the balance forward and
ending balance.
I think balance-forward and ending-balance are not meaningful to
transactions subtotalled by Category or Payee, etc.; just to
transactions subtotalled by a date of some type (which includes
"Don't subtotal").
--
John Pollard
First initial underscore Last name at mchsi dot com
Please reply to newsgroup
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap