|
Posted by JM on December 6, 2008, 11:35 am
Please log in for more thread options > Hi, Bob.
>
> > every time I've looked into e-filing using TurboTax, it was clear that
> > those filing a K1 form couldn't e-file.
>
> Could you please tell us where you found that when you looked? =A0Was it =
in
> Intuit documentation, or something from the IRS, or from some news story =
or
> other third-party comment? =A0I haven't found a specific instruction, one=
way
> or the other, for 2008. =A0Have you?
>
> RC
> --
> R. C. White, CPA
> San Marcos, TX
> (Retired. =A0No longer licensed to practice public accounting.)
> r...@grandecom.net
> Microsoft Windows MVP
> (Running Windows Live Mail 2008 0908 in Win7 x64 6801)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >> Hi, Bob.
>
> >> I've been out of practice for over a decade, but so far as I know, hav=
ing
> >> income on a K-1 from a partnership is no barrier to e-filing. =A0Is it=
?
>
> >> Or did you mean that you want to e-file the partnership's return, Form
> >> 1065? There has never been a requirement to attach the K-1 to the
> >> individual partner's Form 1040. =A0All that is needed is the data from=
the
> >> K-1, and that can be entered on Schedule E of the 1040, just like so m=
any
> >> other forms of income.
>
> >> Are you SURE you can't e-file?
>
> > I've had the limited partnership for a long time and every time I've
> > looked into e-filing using TurboTax, it was clear that those filing a K=
1
> > form couldn't e-file. =A0Maybe it's changed for this year.- Hide quoted=
text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Hi RC/Bob
Believe I encounted what Bob is descriibing in TY2004. Held shares of
Kinder Morgan Energy Parteners, LP and received K-1 from them.
Completed TTax and elected to eFile [as usual]. As best I can recall,
TTax presented a popup at that point that effectively stated that I
was not eligible for eFile due to inclusion of a particular form
associated with reporting the K-1 info - can not recall what the
particular form # was.
Do recall being quite annoyed and even gave very brief thought to
deleting the offending form - it didn't seem to be particularly
significant and would have been to my disadvantage to delete it -
would have cost me a few bucks in added tax. But thought better of
that approach and cranked up the printer for that year :<(
Don't have my TY2004 info redily avaiable so can not give you the
offending form #.
|