Home Page link  

fidelity - div reinvest

 

Quicken Personal Finance Discussions - Quicken - personal finance software discussions

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
fidelity - div reinvest P.Schuman 09-19-2007
Posted by adi on September 20, 2007, 10:01 pm
Please log in for more thread options
P.Schuman wrote:
>>
>>> I have several different mutual funds from Fidelity, Vanguard, TRowe,
>>> and have conflicting views on how the funds are actually performing.
>>>
>>> Within Quicken -
>>> the divs or cap gains are reported as transaction "div"
>>> and then a corresponding transaction for "buy"
>> Quicken has an alternative - instead of entering two
>> transactions (the div and the buy), use "RD" - "reinvest dividends"
>> transactions. Quicken then knows that you didn't inject
>> any additional money and tracks, separately "amount invested"
>> as opposed to "cost basis".
>>
> yeah - sounds good -
> but of course these DIV + BUY are the transactions being downloaded
> from Fidelity and others....
> Some appear as dividends, some as LT cap gains, etc...
> It's tough.... when we really didn't inject any more investment capital,
> but yet, I guess we "did" when we received the dividend payout.

I'm not sure if I understand where your concerns are, but I'll
throw in what my take is (I have a bunch of Fidelity funds myself).

First I'll say that I use to have the same issues as you do
(I think). However, in order to minimize the amount
of work in reconciling with the monthly statements, I
now use the downloaded transactions as is. It matches
up with the statement more readily.

The different type of dividends (div, short term, long term) are
necessary because the taxes paid are different for short vs. long
term. The BUY is necessary because you are truly buying more of the
funds, even if you don't handle it yourself. It would be the
same as if you received the dividends transferred in your
checking account and then sent the money to Fidelity and
bought it yourself. From the IRS standpoint, Reinvesting
is a Buy.

WRT how the fund is performing, I look at the ROI. This is
(the last I checked) the calculation of ($Return) / ($Invested).
It is the total profit if you sold at the market price.


> The harder one is with any of the MMF - since the "price/nav" stays at $1.

At one point I wanted to know this as well. So I
created a Security (e.g. FDRXX) and for each Cash
transaction, Div/Int, Sell, Buy, etc. which changed
"Cash" I would add a new entry for the MM security.
So if I sold a stock and received $100 in the "Cash", I
would then Buy $100 of the MM security.

But now I'm too lazy. If I want to know what the interest
rate is, the Fidelity statement shows the yield. e.g. for
last month, the FDRXX 7-day yield was 5.08%.

HTH

Posted by P.Schuman on September 20, 2007, 11:44 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> P.Schuman wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have several different mutual funds from Fidelity, Vanguard, TRowe,
> >>> and have conflicting views on how the funds are actually performing.
> >>>
> >>> Within Quicken -
> >>> the divs or cap gains are reported as transaction "div"
> >>> and then a corresponding transaction for "buy"
> >> Quicken has an alternative - instead of entering two
> >> transactions (the div and the buy), use "RD" - "reinvest dividends"
> >> transactions. Quicken then knows that you didn't inject
> >> any additional money and tracks, separately "amount invested"
> >> as opposed to "cost basis".
> >>
> > yeah - sounds good -
> > but of course these DIV + BUY are the transactions being downloaded
> > from Fidelity and others....
> > Some appear as dividends, some as LT cap gains, etc...
> > It's tough.... when we really didn't inject any more investment capital,
> > but yet, I guess we "did" when we received the dividend payout.
>
> I'm not sure if I understand where your concerns are, but I'll
> throw in what my take is (I have a bunch of Fidelity funds myself).
>
> First I'll say that I use to have the same issues as you do
> (I think). However, in order to minimize the amount
> of work in reconciling with the monthly statements, I
> now use the downloaded transactions as is. It matches
> up with the statement more readily.
>
> The different type of dividends (div, short term, long term) are
> necessary because the taxes paid are different for short vs. long
> term. The BUY is necessary because you are truly buying more of the
> funds, even if you don't handle it yourself. It would be the
> same as if you received the dividends transferred in your
> checking account and then sent the money to Fidelity and
> bought it yourself. From the IRS standpoint, Reinvesting
> is a Buy.
>
> WRT how the fund is performing, I look at the ROI. This is
> (the last I checked) the calculation of ($Return) / ($Invested).
> It is the total profit if you sold at the market price.
>
>
> > The harder one is with any of the MMF - since the "price/nav" stays at $1.
>
> At one point I wanted to know this as well. So I
> created a Security (e.g. FDRXX) and for each Cash
> transaction, Div/Int, Sell, Buy, etc. which changed
> "Cash" I would add a new entry for the MM security.
> So if I sold a stock and received $100 in the "Cash", I
> would then Buy $100 of the MM security.
>
> But now I'm too lazy. If I want to know what the interest
> rate is, the Fidelity statement shows the yield. e.g. for
> last month, the FDRXX 7-day yield was 5.08%.
>

I know all the reasons for the separation of the downloaded transactions,
it just makes it tougher to see relative performamce.
tnx for the reminder on ROI... now I just have to go find the account ROI in
Quicken.
I know I stumbled across this same discusssion before,
and Pollard probably answered it... have to go search the newsgroup.

For the MMF, I just pull up my Yahoo Portfolio and can see it there.
I created the portfolio on Yahoo since Quicken has for the past several months
stopped downloading the "news" icons, and I needed an easy way to keep up
with the "news" related to each security - without a bunch of mouse clicks per
security.



Posted by adi on September 21, 2007, 12:27 am
Please log in for more thread options
P.Schuman wrote:
<snip>
> tnx for the reminder on ROI... now I just have to go find the account ROI in
> Quicken.
In Investing Center > Portfolio tab there are the different
"Views" on the left as "Show:" and bunch of options in the
dropdown list. I created my own (on the right side) under the
"Options > Customize Current View" where I have the following items:

Name
Ticker Symbol
Quote/Price
Shares
Market Value
Market Value %
Cost Basis
Cost Basis %
Return YTD
ROI (%) YTD
ROI (%) 1-Year
ROI (%) 3-Year
ROI (%) 5-Year
ROI (%)
Return

Posted by Andrew DeFaria on September 21, 2007, 1:15 am
Please log in for more thread options
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------090808030601050603020404
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

adi wrote:
> The BUY is necessary because you are truly buying more of the funds,
> even if you don't handle it yourself.
Excuse me for saying so but *so what!* The two transactions can be
represented as one transaction in Quicken with no ill effect.
> It would be the same as if you received the dividends transferred in
> your checking account and then sent the money to Fidelity and bought
> it yourself. From the IRS standpoint, Reinvesting is a Buy.
Again, so what. Having 2 transactions does me no good. One transaction
makes perfect sense here.
--
Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely
foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. - Douglas
Adams

--------------090808030601050603020404
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
adi wrote:
is necessary because you are truly buying more of the
funds, even if you don't handle it yourself.</blockquote>
Excuse me for saying so but <b>so what!</b> The two transactions can
be represented as one transaction in Quicken with no ill effect.<br>
be the
same as if you received the dividends transferred in your&nbsp; checking
account and then sent the money to Fidelity and bought it yourself.&nbsp;
From the IRS standpoint, Reinvesting
is a Buy.
<br>
</blockquote>
Again, so what. Having 2 transactions does me no good. One transaction
makes perfect sense here.<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<a href="http://defaria.com">Andrew DeFaria</a><br>
<small><font color="#999999">A common mistake people make when trying
to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the
ingenuity of complete fools. - Douglas Adams</font></small>
</div>
</body>
</html>

--------------090808030601050603020404--

Posted by adi on September 21, 2007, 2:52 am
Please log in for more thread options
Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> adi wrote:
>> The BUY is necessary because you are truly buying more of the funds,
>> even if you don't handle it yourself.
> Excuse me for saying so but *so what!* The two transactions can be
> represented as one transaction in Quicken with no ill effect.
>> It would be the same as if you received the dividends transferred in
>> your checking account and then sent the money to Fidelity and bought
>> it yourself. From the IRS standpoint, Reinvesting is a Buy.
> Again, so what. Having 2 transactions does me no good. One transaction
> makes perfect sense here.

I know it doesn't matter whether it's one transaction or two. As
I had prefaced in my post, I wasn't sure where his concerns were.
The OP mentioned the DIV & BUY transactions. He also mentioned
about determining fund performance. He appeared to be confused
(to me) about Dividends as regular or LT. Again I wasn't sure
where he was confused. So I tried to address all issues. He
responded that he understood about the multiple transactions.
That's fine. But I did seem to help him with the ROI
information and he had a way to deal with his MM funds.
So he seemed to be satisfied with my response.

What I didn't understand was your weird discourse. It
was of no help to the OP.

OK, your turn to rant...

Similar ThreadsPosted
Reinvest Dividend June 4, 2006, 4:12 pm
Reinvest Dividend Delusion December 15, 2007, 12:19 pm
OL-292-B and Fidelity NetBenefits February 26, 2007, 12:22 pm
Quicken and Fidelity accounts April 14, 2007, 1:10 am
OL-297-A error with Fidelity NetBenefits April 6, 2008, 7:18 pm
Converting Fidelity CVS to QIF or OFX for Quicken 2007 March 5, 2007, 4:01 pm
Fidelity Download Problem Solved October 1, 2007, 9:49 am
401K Moved from Hewitt to Fidelity January 25, 2008, 6:15 pm
Fidelity downloads stopped working 1/21... January 25, 2008, 7:22 pm
Fidelity account login change February 16, 2008, 1:01 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap