|
Posted by John B in CA on October 19, 2007, 10:05 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Scott,
My Quicken file contains data going back to 1991. The QDF file is 32MB, and
all files combined are 45MB. My file takes longer to load than a smaller
file, but once loaded, Quicken continues to work quickly and efficiently.
I've only been using '08H&B for a few days, but so far I see no performance
difference between it and '07H&B.
John B.
>I just bought Quicken 2008 Premier for Windows and installed it on an XP
>system. I have read numerous horror storries. I have to say that so far I
>haven't had any bad experiences and performance seems to be much better
>than it used to be. The only negative performance I've seen is with some
>of the newer screens. They take a couple of seconds to display. The one
>thing I am noticing is that so far I haven't seen much different than 2007.
>Although I'm finding the Cash Flow / My Savings Plan view to be very
>interesting. I'm not completely following it yet but I'll figure it out.
>It seems like it might be something I've been looking for a long time.
>Here's to hoping anyway.
>
> I'm curious. What are the common file sizes some of you folks have? Here
> are mine (rounded):
> QDF 16MB
> QEL 1MB
> QPH 2MB
> QTX 6KB
>
> When folks talk of performance problems could it be related to file size?
> I'm curious how mine compares. Intuit seems to have done something to
> improve performance in 2008. It is noticeably faster in several areas.
>
> Scott
>
|