|
Posted by Mel on October 13, 2009, 8:31 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Mel wrote:
>>>
>>> The simplest way when you have just a few transactions is to just
>>> Edit the transactions for one security to use the name of the other
>>> security.
>
>> I tried that now and before I first posted. I get a message
>> saying security exists and to use another name. Can't get past that..
>
> I can't imagine how you could get that message if you Edit a transaction
> and change the "Security name" to another security name. We're talking
> about the name found in transactions in the "Transactions" tab of the
> investment account.
>
> The message you mention is what you get if you try to enter a Corporate
> Name Change transaction to a security name that already exists, or a
> Corporate Spinoff transaction to a security name that already exists.
>
> But there should be no such message if you Edit a Buy transaction (for
> example) and select (or key) Fund B (in the "Security name" field) where
> the transaction originally was for Fund A.
>
>> However it also says "if you are trying to enter a transaction for
>> this security, try record transaction from a investment account."
>> Sorry but I do not understand what it wants me to do.
>
>
> --
>
> John Pollard
>
I see now what you meant and what I was doing differently. In my
transactions list I have data going back to 1995, over 200 entries. I can
also see that trying to separate these would be a major job and I cannot
imagine a automated process. I will live with the way it is currently set
up. Thank you for your help.
Mel
|