Home Page link  

1040 NR and definition of "US taxable income"

 

Taxes General Forum - Tax professionals meeting place and answers to queries. (Moderated)

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
1040 NR and definition of "US taxable income" Yossarian 09-02-2008
Posted by Yossarian on September 2, 2008, 6:42 pm
Please log in for more thread options


Hello everybody,
Question from an expat.
I am european, I work in USA, with a E1 non resident visa, in the
american branch of an italian company.
I get my salary directly from the italian company (in euro). It is
taxed also by the italian "irs".
My residency is still officially italian, but I live in US form more
that 183 days per year.
The question: is it correct to consider such income a "US taxable
income"?
I have always filed the 1040 NR considering that income (+ all the
benefits) as a US income, even if it is not coming directly from the
american company.

For example
http://law.gsu.edu/taxclinic/index/substantive_issues/resident_and_non-resident_aliens

it says "A non-resident alien (NRA) usually is subject to U.S. income
tax only on U.S. source income"

And since the service is performed in US, the source is US and the
income for the service (my salary) should be considered a taxable
income.

Is my interpretation correct?

thanks in advance for the answers

Y.

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by Alan on September 2, 2008, 9:07 pm
Please log in for more thread options


Yossarian wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> Question from an expat.
> I am european, I work in USA, with a E1 non resident visa, in the
> american branch of an italian company.
> I get my salary directly from the italian company (in euro). It is
> taxed also by the italian "irs".
> My residency is still officially italian, but I live in US form more
> that 183 days per year.
> The question: is it correct to consider such income a "US taxable
> income"?
> I have always filed the 1040 NR considering that income (+ all the
> benefits) as a US income, even if it is not coming directly from the
> american company.
>
> For example
http://law.gsu.edu/taxclinic/index/substantive_issues/resident_and_non-resident_aliens
>
> it says "A non-resident alien (NRA) usually is subject to U.S. income
> tax only on U.S. source income"
>
> And since the service is performed in US, the source is US and the
> income for the service (my salary) should be considered a taxable
> income.
>
> Is my interpretation correct?
>
> thanks in advance for the answers
>
> Y.
>
The link at GSU is correct in its interpretation on how resident
and nonresident aliens are taxed: Residents on worldwide income
and they file a 1040. Nonresident aliens on US source income and
they file a 1040-NR. Any income you earn performing services in
the US holding an E-1 visa, is US source income regardless of
where the payments come from. The page at GSU does not tell you
who is a resident and who is a nonresident for tax purposes.
There is a link on that page to IRS Pub 519, US Tax Guide for
Aliens. http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p519.pdf In that Pub you
will find a definition of the substantial presence test. If you
have a substantial presence in the US, you are treated as a
resident alien for tax purposes and all of your worldwide income
becomes subject to US taxes. You state that you are present in
the US for more than 183 days. That is enough to pass the
substantial presence test and make you a resident alien for tax
purposes. You would file a 1040, not a 1040-NR. As a resident
alien you may avail yourself of all the tax benefits in the law
that are available to US citizens.

Lastly, assuming that Italy is your home country, there is a tax
treaty between the two nations. However, as you spend more than
183 days in the US, there is no exemption from US taxes on income
paid to you from a foreign employer for work performed in the US.
In addition, under the treaty, Italy does not necessarily have to
tax the income you earn in the US that is taxed by the US unless
they so desire. This is known in tax treaties as the "savings
clause." If Italy is taxing your compensation earned in the US,
you would be eligible for a foreign tax credit on your US tax
return (1040) for taxes you pay to Italy on the same income being
taxed by the US. This is explained in IRS Pub 514 and the
instructions for Form 1116. See link below.
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1116.pdf
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i1116.pdf
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p514.pdf

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by Condor on September 3, 2008, 1:38 am
Please log in for more thread options


> My residency is still officially italian, but I live in US form more
> that 183 days per year.

As Alan responded, you meet the substantial presence test to be considered a
U.S. resident for tax purposes because of your presence in the U.S. for more
than 183 days. Even though you clearly meet the substantial presence test,
you still can qualify to be taxed as a nonresident alien if you are able to
demonstrate a "Closer Connection" to Italy than to the U.S. If you assert a
closer connection exception to the substantial presence test, you must
attach IRS Form 8840 to your tax return. The closer connection exception
criteria are explained on page 7 of Publication 519.

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p519.pdf

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f8840.pdf


Condor

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by jmail7 on September 3, 2008, 10:53 am
Please log in for more thread options


> > My residency is still officially italian, but I live in US form more
> > that 183 days per year.
>
> As Alan responded, you meet the substantial presence test to be considered a
> U.S. resident for tax purposes because of your presence in the U.S. for more
> than 183 days.  Even though you clearly meet the substantial presence test,
> you still can qualify to be taxed as a nonresident alien if you are able to
> demonstrate a "Closer Connection" to Italy than to the U.S.  If you assert a
> closer connection exception to the substantial presence test, you must
> attach IRS Form 8840 to your tax return.  The closer connection exception
> criteria are explained on page 7 of Publication 519.

I agree with the earlier posters that you meet the substantial
presence test and therefore would be treated as a resident of the U.S.
if not for the treaty. The closer connection exception referred to by
Condor is not part of the treaty and does not apply to your situation
because you are in the U.S. for more than 183 days during the year
(see instructions to Form 8840). You need to look at the "tie-
breaker" provisions of the treaty to determine whether you can claim
relief under the treaty to not be considered a resident of the U.S.
If you do claim to not be treated as a U.S. resident under the treaty,
you may need to file a separate form on your tax return claiming a
treaty-based return position (I can't recall the form number right
now).

Also, if Italy is taxing you on the U.S. income, you will not qualify
for the "normal" foreign tax credit rules because the income will not
be "foreign source" income. As a result, you would need to look at
the treaty to see what the provisions are for avoiding double
taxation. These provisions may allow you to "resource" a portion of
the US source income to be treated as foreign source income, or it may
provide other rules.

Andrew Mitchel, Esq.
Essex, Connecticut
http://www.andrewmitchel.com
http://intltax.typepad.com

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by Alan on September 3, 2008, 11:35 am
Please log in for more thread options


jmail7@andrewmitchel.com wrote:
>>> My residency is still officially italian, but I live in US form more
>>> that 183 days per year.
>> As Alan responded, you meet the substantial presence test to be considered a
>> U.S. resident for tax purposes because of your presence in the U.S. for more
>> than 183 days. Even though you clearly meet the substantial presence test,
>> you still can qualify to be taxed as a nonresident alien if you are able to
>> demonstrate a "Closer Connection" to Italy than to the U.S. If you assert a
>> closer connection exception to the substantial presence test, you must
>> attach IRS Form 8840 to your tax return. The closer connection exception
>> criteria are explained on page 7 of Publication 519.
>
> I agree with the earlier posters that you meet the substantial
> presence test and therefore would be treated as a resident of the U.S.
> if not for the treaty. The closer connection exception referred to by
> Condor is not part of the treaty and does not apply to your situation
> because you are in the U.S. for more than 183 days during the year
> (see instructions to Form 8840). You need to look at the "tie-
> breaker" provisions of the treaty to determine whether you can claim
> relief under the treaty to not be considered a resident of the U.S.
> If you do claim to not be treated as a U.S. resident under the treaty,
> you may need to file a separate form on your tax return claiming a
> treaty-based return position (I can't recall the form number right
> now).
>
> Also, if Italy is taxing you on the U.S. income, you will not qualify
> for the "normal" foreign tax credit rules because the income will not
> be "foreign source" income. As a result, you would need to look at
> the treaty to see what the provisions are for avoiding double
> taxation. These provisions may allow you to "resource" a portion of
> the US source income to be treated as foreign source income, or it may
> provide other rules.
>
> Andrew Mitchel, Esq.
> Essex, Connecticut
> http://www.andrewmitchel.com
> http://intltax.typepad.com
>
I should have realized this in my original post. As Italy is
electing to tax the compensation earned in the US by someone who
is a resident or citizen of Italy, it is foreign sourced income
to Italy. As such, under Article 23 of the treaty, Italy would
provide the foreign tax credit against its income taxes.

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Similar ThreadsPosted
1041 v. 1040 taxable income for estate planning trusts December 27, 2007, 4:41 pm
1040 filing requirement if NOL carryforward but no current year income September 27, 2008, 8:37 pm
taxable income ? October 2, 2007, 10:09 pm
Taxable Disability Income March 14, 2007, 12:22 am
Taxable income: when accrued or when paid January 7, 2007, 11:30 pm
Is Lease Buyout Taxable Income? July 9, 2007, 12:31 am
Why is catching a baseball taxable income? August 10, 2007, 2:03 am
Re: Why is catching a baseball taxable income? August 13, 2007, 10:24 pm
Re: Why is catching a baseball taxable income? August 14, 2007, 3:57 pm
Re: Why is catching a baseball taxable income? August 17, 2007, 12:08 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap