|
Posted by D. Stussy on February 14, 2008, 5:46 pm
Please log in for more thread options > wrote:
> >
> > <<<Snip what's mostly not important>>>
> >
> > > Are monies spent towards legal fees in defending/quashing
> > > the void orders deductible, as miscellaneous deductions for
> > > protection/collection of income, since quashing the orders
> > > was necessary to ensure that I was able to collect all taxable
> > > income that was due me from my employer?
> >
> > As much as you may think otherwise, this is not for the
> > "protection/collection of income". Your gross wages would remain the
same.
> > Your net would be less due to the wage garnishment for alimony.
> >
> > No deduction.
>
> Damn. Figured I'd ask, since there was a void order in there, which
> usually isn't the
> case.
>
> I'm guessing the rule is, if it increases gross income (rather than
> minimizing
> adjustments), it's more likely to be deductible; if it's simply
> minimizing adjustments to
> gross income, it isn't deductible?
>
> Why don't they say that? :-b
They do. "Production of income" does not mean "production of deductions."
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|