Home Page link  

Big deduction for state tax: implications on estimated tax payments, AMT, penalties

 

Taxes General Forum - Tax professionals meeting place and answers to queries. (Moderated)

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Big deduction for state tax: implications on estimated tax payments, AMT, penalties derkire 06-12-2008
Posted by derkire on June 14, 2008, 9:27 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On Jun 14, 2:17 pm, se...@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
>
> >Ed, how can 46809/160000=0.293 be the effective tax rate under AMT
> >rules, given that max AMT rate is 28% as far as I know?
>
> There are phaseouts, so the maximum marginal AMT is more like 35%
> (possibly higher).
>
> Seth

Seth, Wikipedia agrees with you that the AMT exemption phaseout
above 150,000 causes the marginal rate to increase towards 35%,
but my observation was about the effective (aka. average) rate. How
can the effective rate be over 28% of gross. I simply do not
understand
how that is mathematically possible.

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by ed on June 15, 2008, 12:02 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On Jun 14, 8:27 pm, derk...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jun 14, 2:17 pm, se...@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
>
> > In article
>
> > >Ed, how can 46809/160000=0.293 be the effective tax rate under AMT
> > >rules, given that max AMT rate is 28% as far as I know?
>
> > There are phaseouts, so the maximum marginal AMT is more like 35%
> > (possibly higher).
>
> > Seth
>
> Seth, Wikipedia agrees with you that the AMT exemption phaseout
> above 150,000 causes the marginal rate to increase towards 35%,
> but my observation was about the effective (aka. average) rate. How
> can the effective rate be over 28% of gross. I simply do not
> understand
> how that is mathematically possible.

Derk: The annualized income for the 2nd quarter, cumulatively, is
$384,000 (160K*2.4). the TMT on 384K is $104,020 ( by then you've
lost the entire AMT Exemption so it's .28 * 384,000-3500=104,020))
Multiply that by .45 factor to get cumulative tax due for 2nd quarter
$46,809.. They get you on the factors, 2.4 X .45 = 1.08. Probably
because of the short (2 month long) quarter. Another reason not to
make quick estimates when annualizing.

ed

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by removeps-groups@yahoo.com on June 12, 2008, 10:57 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On Jun 12, 6:51 pm, derk...@gmail.com wrote:

> I'm trying to understand the implications of the 100k payment on
> my 2008 federal and state taxes. There are two areas that I have
> identified as likely sticky points.
>
> 1. Payment of estimated taxes in 2008
>
> Since I have a 100k deduction available, I would like not to
> pay estimated taxes in 2008 until I reach 100k worth of
> income/gains. Is this a reasonable approach for fed and state
> estimated taxes?

No, because of AMT. If you expect your net income this year to be
100K, then likely you're not in AMT and your taxable income will be
$0. You have to run the numbers through a computer program.

> I further plan on using irs.form2210/2210AI and the
> "annualized" method to avoid troubles with underpayments of
> estimated tax if income/gains arrive unevenly (and I think
> they will).

There is a thread "Estimated Tax Issue (Hypothetical)" going on right
now in this newsgroup. You can read it for additional info if you
want.

> 2. AMT in 2008
>
> With the big whopping 100k deduction being a tax preference
> item for AMT, I think I risk that AMT will be larger than
> regular tax in 2008, and hence take effect. If this occurs,
> will AMT then lead to penalties for underpayments, since per
> assumption I did not make estimated tax payments in some or
> all quarters?

When you fill out Schedule AI of form 2210, you will be asked to
compute your tax for each quarter, and to do this you use the usual
method -- which includes AMT, foreign tax credit, etc. Say for the
first quarter (January to March 31) you had 40k AGI of which 5k was
qualified dividends, and the foreign tax credit was $200, and CA state
tax paid was 4k. Annualize the numbers by multiplying by 4; this
gives you 160k AGI, of which 20k qualified dividends, $800 foreign tax
credit, 16k CA state tax. Calculate the tax on this annualized amount
using regular form 1040. Then divided it by 4 to get the first
quarter installment, but as you only have to pay 90% of the tax due,
multiply this quarter tax by 90%; or in other words multiply the
annualized tax by 22.5%.

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by ed on June 12, 2008, 11:39 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On Jun 12, 9:57 pm, "removeps-gro...@yahoo.com" <removeps-
gro...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 12, 6:51 pm, derk...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to understand the implications of the 100k payment on
> > my 2008 federal and state taxes. There are two areas that I have
> > identified as likely sticky points.
>
> > 1. Payment of estimated taxes in 2008
>
> >    Since I have a 100k deduction available, I would like not to
> >    pay estimated taxes in 2008 until I reach 100k worth of
> >    income/gains. Is this a reasonable approach for fed and state
> >    estimated taxes?
>
> No, because of AMT.  If you expect your net income this year to be
> 100K, then likely you're not in AMT and your taxable income will be
> $0.  You have to run the numbers through a computer program.
>
> >    I further plan on using irs.form2210/2210AI and the
> >    "annualized" method to avoid troubles with underpayments of
> >    estimated tax if income/gains arrive unevenly (and I think
> >    they will).
>
> There is a thread "Estimated Tax Issue (Hypothetical)" going on right
> now in this newsgroup.  You can read it for additional info if you
> want.
>
> > 2. AMT in 2008
>
> >    With the big whopping 100k deduction being a tax preference
> >    item for AMT, I think I risk that AMT will be larger than
> >    regular tax in 2008, and hence take effect. If this occurs,
> >    will AMT then lead to penalties for underpayments, since per
> >    assumption I did not make estimated tax payments in some or
> >    all quarters?
>
> When you fill out Schedule AI of form 2210, you will be asked to
> compute your tax for each quarter, and to do this you use the usual
> method -- which includes AMT, foreign tax credit, etc.  Say for the
> first quarter (January to March 31) you had 40k AGI of which 5k was
> qualified dividends, and the foreign tax credit was $200, and CA state
> tax paid was 4k.  Annualize the numbers by multiplying by 4; this
> gives you 160k AGI, of which 20k qualified dividends, $800 foreign tax
> credit, 16k CA state tax.  Calculate the tax on this annualized amount
> using regular form 1040.  Then divided it by 4 to get the first
> quarter installment, but as you only have to pay 90% of the tax due,
> multiply this quarter tax by 90%; or in other words multiply the
> annualized tax by 22.5%.

I suggest you download a form 2210 tax calculator instead of trying to
do this manually. Your $100,000 state tax deduction will make a huge
difference, and could push you into AMT territory. The calculator
will compute all this.

ed

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by derkire on June 13, 2008, 1:26 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> I suggest you download a form 2210 tax calculator instead of trying to
> do this manually. Your $100,000 state tax deduction will make a huge
> difference, and could push you into AMT territory. The calculator
> will compute all this.
>
> ed


Hi Ed, I suppose this would be the spreadsheet from edco software.
Boy, I wish there was something simpler I could do. That spreadsheet
is nearly as complex as full tax software, if you ask me. Great
effort, though
on the spreadsheet,.

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Similar ThreadsPosted
Can I make just state estimated tax payments? May 30, 2008, 11:58 pm
Help on estimated taxes/penalties October 7, 2008, 12:16 am
Penalties for not paying estimated taxes? May 29, 2007, 10:45 pm
Re: Penalties for not paying estimated taxes? June 1, 2007, 10:42 am
New C corp. - Estimated tax payments? April 9, 2007, 3:10 am
1099 and Estimated Payments August 7, 2007, 11:26 pm
Re: 1099 and Estimated Payments August 10, 2007, 2:03 am
Re: 1099 and Estimated Payments August 17, 2007, 12:02 am
Wacky Estimated Tax Payments? March 7, 2008, 11:30 pm
scheduling of estimated tax payments wrt. income March 26, 2008, 4:42 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap