|
Taxes General Forum - Tax professionals meeting place and answers to queries. (Moderated)
|
|
|
|
|
Posted by kastnna on July 14, 2009, 9:38 am
Please log in for more thread options
I have a 5 member LLC that owns comercial real estate for which the
LLC receives rents. The members receive pass-through income and a K-1
annually. Can this income be diverted into a qualified retirement plan
(either employee or employer, doesn't matter which)?
Thanks
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|
|
Posted by paulthomascpa on July 14, 2009, 10:34 am
Please log in for more thread options
>I have a 5 member LLC that owns comercial real estate for which the
> LLC receives rents. The members receive pass-through income and a K-1
> annually. Can this income be diverted into a qualified retirement plan
> (either employee or employer, doesn't matter which)?
>
Nope. At least not as it is currently distributed to the partners. Rental
profits retain their "not earned" status - ie: not subject to SE or
employment tax.
Only earned income, subject to Self-Employment or payroll taxes, can be used
for any qualified plan like an IRA, 401k, SEP, etc.
Rental profits never have been allowed for that purpose.
--
Paul Thomas, CPA
www.paulthomascpa.com
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|
|
Posted by kastnna on July 14, 2009, 12:56 pm
Please log in for more thread options wrote:
> Nope. At least not as it is currently distributed to the partners. Rental
> profits retain their "not earned" status - ie: not subject to SE or
> employment tax.
>
> Only earned income, subject to Self-Employment or payroll taxes, can be used
> for any qualified plan like an IRA, 401k, SEP, etc.
>
> Rental profits never have been allowed for that purpose.
>
Thank you, sir. I suspected it was an "earned v. unearned" issue.
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|
|
Posted by Gene E. Utterback, EA, RFC, AB on July 14, 2009, 4:34 pm
Please log in for more thread options > wrote:
>> Nope. At least not as it is currently distributed to the partners. Rental
>> profits retain their "not earned" status - ie: not subject to SE or
>> employment tax.
>>
>> Only earned income, subject to Self-Employment or payroll taxes, can be
>> used
>> for any qualified plan like an IRA, 401k, SEP, etc.
>>
>> Rental profits never have been allowed for that purpose.
>>
>
> Thank you, sir. I suspected it was an "earned v. unearned" issue.
True, BUT maybe the earnings, or some of them can be recategorized.
If the LLC members actively participate in the management of the rental
COULD they draw a salary (or since it's an LLC guaranteed payment to
members) and consequently reclassify those draws as earned income, subject
to SE tax? I don't know the answer, but I have several clients who've
raised the question and I'm looking into it. I have not had particularly
good luck in finding anything that specifically allows this - BUT neither
have I found anything that expressly prohibits it either.
And yet, I'm still not comfortable in sanctioning it.
Good luck,
Gene E. Utterback, EA, RFC, ABA
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|
|
Posted by HLunsford on July 27, 2009, 8:52 pm
Please log in for more thread options Gene E. Utterback, EA, RFC, ABA wrote:
>> wrote:
>>> Nope. At least not as it is currently distributed to the partners. Rental
>>> profits retain their "not earned" status - ie: not subject to SE or
>>> employment tax.
>>>
>>> Only earned income, subject to Self-Employment or payroll taxes, can be
>>> used
>>> for any qualified plan like an IRA, 401k, SEP, etc.
>>>
>>> Rental profits never have been allowed for that purpose.
>>>
>> Thank you, sir. I suspected it was an "earned v. unearned" issue.
>
> True, BUT maybe the earnings, or some of them can be recategorized.
>
> If the LLC members actively participate in the management of the rental
> COULD they draw a salary (or since it's an LLC guaranteed payment to
> members) and consequently reclassify those draws as earned income, subject
> to SE tax? I don't know the answer, but I have several clients who've
> raised the question and I'm looking into it. I have not had particularly
> good luck in finding anything that specifically allows this - BUT neither
> have I found anything that expressly prohibits it either.
>
> And yet, I'm still not comfortable in sanctioning it.
>
I guess that's why I favor having LLC's choosing the S corporation option.
ChEAr$,
Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | 401K for W-2 job, plus "individual" 401K for 1099 income ? | March 17, 2008, 8:28 pm |
| Solo 401K (aka Individual 401K) same as Super-Simplified 401K? | December 3, 2007, 12:49 am |
| Roth 401k - Income Tax Return Reporting | May 7, 2007, 1:29 pm |
| 401k question: Mixed 1099 and W2 income | January 10, 2008, 3:55 pm |
| IRS Tax Shelter Cases | August 19, 2009, 9:52 am |
| Sale of Real Estate Tax Shelter | April 13, 2008, 10:47 am |
| Roth 401K vs. "Regular" 401K? | January 1, 2008, 9:13 pm |
| Reform a Credit Shelter Trust to make it a Grantor Trust? | November 19, 2007, 6:10 pm |
| Is the Credit Shelter Trust a Grantor Trust? | September 24, 2007, 8:48 pm |
| Re: Is the Credit Shelter Trust a Grantor Trust? | September 28, 2007, 3:59 pm |
|
|
|