Home Page link  

Can my Son's Mother's boyfriend claim my son on his tax return?

 

Taxes General Forum - Tax professionals meeting place and answers to queries. (Moderated)

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Can my Son's Mother's boyfriend claim my son on his tax return? thomasvr1 02-10-2007
Posted by thomasvr1 on February 13, 2007, 1:30 am
Please log in for more thread options
> thomas...@gmail.com wrote:

>> Here's the deal. My son's mother is on disability and does
>> not work or produce an income (although I do pay her child
>> support). Her boyfriend lives with her, in her house, and
>> he does work. He has no legal rights to my son at all. My
>> son lives with me 3 days a week. She told me that her
>> boyfriend claimed my son on his tax return for 2006. All
>> the info I can find at the IRS website says that since 2005,
>> a person cannot claim a child that is not their own, or you
>> have to be a blood relative, which he is not. I also found
>> info supporting that he cannot file as head of household
>> (posted below). My question is, how in the world could
>> someone legally claim a child that is not their own? If
>> they filed joinly would that make a difference? This
>> doesn't seem right, but apparently whoever did their taxes
>> for them let them do it. Should I call the IRS and report
>> it? Please help!
>>
>> Info about Head of Household Status
>>
>> Take the situation of an unmarried man living with his
>> unemployed girlfriend and her young child. The family of
>> three lives solely on his earned income.
>>
>> In 2004, the man could claim his girlfriend and her child
>> both as his dependents and file his return as a head of
>> household, resulting in lower taxes. But for 2005, he may
>> not use the child to claim head-of- household status because
>> he and the child are not blood related.
>>
>> Formerly, the primary test was the support test. The the
>> man was eligible to file as head-of-household because he
>> supported a child living in his household.
>>
>> Now the primary test is the relationship test, and he would
>> fail that because he and the child are not related. And
>> since the mother is not employed, and therefore does not
>> file income tax returns, no one can claim this child as a
>> dependent -- not even the person who provides 100 percent of
>> the child's financial support.

> Based on the facts you presented (lives with you 3 days a
> week), I have assumed that the remaining time is spent
> living with his mother. Your son is the qualifying child of
> his mother. As such, the boyfriend can not claim the child.
> Only the mother can claim the child unless she releases the
> dependency exemption to you. She can use IRS Form 8332 to do
> that. If the facts are different and the child does spend
> more than 6 months living with you, then your son is your
> qualifying child and you should file claiming all the tax
> benefits inherent in having a qualifying child. If the
> boyfriend already e-filed, you would have to file a paper
> return.
>
> As the qualifying child of the mother, the child is the
> qualifying person for his mother to file as head of
> household. The boyfriend can not use your son as his
> qualifying person to file as head of household.
>
> Relative to a taxpayer claiming a dependency exemption for a
> totally unrelated individual: It is possible under the
> following circumstances: The qualifying person can not be
> the qualifying child for someone else. The qualifying
> person must reside with the taxpayer for the whole year. The
> qualifying person's taxable gross income must be less than
> $3300. The taxpayer must provide more than half of the total
> support for the qualifying person. In the addition, the
> taxpayer can not be the dependent of another taxpayer.
>
> Under the above scenario, it is possible that your son's
> mother is a dependent of the boyfriend if he passes the
> tests I mentioned in the previous paragraph. Even if he
> passes the test, he would still be unable to claim her if
> you and she are married and agree to file a joint return
> that reflects a tax liability. She can not be a qualifying
> person for purposes of the boyfriend filing as head of
> household.
>
> Whether or not you should call the IRS and report the
> situation is an individual decision that you have to make. I
> have no idea what type of relationship you have or care to
> have with the child's mother.

Thank you for your reply. After explaining the details of
this situation to my local H&R block office, they determined
that the only way that her boyfriend could've claimed my son
is if they filed together as married filing joinly. In my
state it is legal to do so even if you are not married,
however after you do that you BECOME MARRIED and are
required to file as married from there on out. If they
filed as married, then the IRS would think that my son is
his step-son, thereby making him a qualifying child. It's a
pretty scummy move, which follows along the lines of most of
the things those two do.

Thanks again for your reply.

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Posted by Dick Adams on February 13, 2007, 5:02 pm
Please log in for more thread options
thomasvr1@gmail.com wrote:

> Thank you for your reply. After explaining the details of
> this situation to my local H&R block office, they determined
> that the only way that her boyfriend could've claimed my son
> is if they filed together as married filing joinly. In my
> state it is legal to do so even if you are not married,
> however after you do that you BECOME MARRIED and are
> required to file as married from there on out. If they
> filed as married, then the IRS would think that my son is
> his step-son, thereby making him a qualifying child. It's a
> pretty scummy move, which follows along the lines of most of
> the things those two do.

Alas H&R Block is giving legal opinions. LoL But why not, we
all do that from time to time. And many times our opinions
are as wrong as the opinion you report.

Here is what's wrong with that opinion. A common-law
marriage requires a 'present-tense' mutual agreement to be
married. When unmarried people file a joint return, it does
NOT necessarily make them married even in a common-law state.
The IRS went after a man in Utah over exactly what is being
proposed here and it was not over a lot of money.

Being shacked-up long-term in a common-law state also does
not necessarily make one married. You must have acted in a
manner consistent with being married and have witnesses to
your past actions.

Dick

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The above is intended for educational purposes only. >>
<< It does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. >>
<< It cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of >>
<< the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed >>
<< upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Posted by Stuart A. Bronstein on February 13, 2007, 10:47 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> Here is what's wrong with that opinion. A common-law
> marriage requires a 'present-tense' mutual agreement to be
> married. When unmarried people file a joint return, it does
> NOT necessarily make them married even in a common-law state.
> The IRS went after a man in Utah over exactly what is being
> proposed here and it was not over a lot of money.

The rule in Texas is that they need three things:

1. Cohabitation
2. Holding out as married
3. Present intent to be married.

The courts there have mostly written out the final
requirement, saying that if the couple hold themselves out
as married (to someone, it need not be to everyone) that is
evidence of their present intent to be married, and all the
evidence required.

> Being shacked-up long-term in a common-law state also does
> not necessarily make one married. You must have acted in a
> manner consistent with being married and have witnesses to
> your past actions.

Exactly. There is also no common law divorce. That is to
say that if you become married under the common law, you
can't get divorced merely by moving out.

Stu

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Posted by Dick Adams on February 14, 2007, 7:28 am
Please log in for more thread options

>> Here is what's wrong with that opinion. A common-law
>> marriage requires a 'present-tense' mutual agreement to be
>> married. When unmarried people file a joint return, it does
>> NOT necessarily make them married even in a common-law state.
>> The IRS went after a man in Utah over exactly what is being
>> proposed here and it was not over a lot of money.

> The rule in Texas is that they need three things:
> 1. Cohabitation
> 2. Holding out as married
> 3. Present intent to be married.

It's 'the present intent to be married' that's a killer.

> The courts there have mostly written out the final
> requirement, saying that if the couple hold themselves out
> as married (to someone, it need not be to everyone) that is
> evidence of their present intent to be married, and all the
> evidence required.

Holding out is the equivalent of 'present intent', but it's
a matter of both parties holding out in the same time frame.
Signing a joint return would be 'holding out' in 2007. But
they would need witnesses for a 2006 'holding out'.

There was a case in Texas when I still had access to
Lexus/Nexus. A coupla lived together for eight years and
then she came into a million dollar plus inheritance and
took a walk. He filed for divorce and produced witnesses
who said he constantly refered to her as his wife as well
as hotel records where he signed in as Mr. & Mrs. Her
attorney produced her tax returns (single) and their leases
where the landlord noted 'an unmarried couple'. She won
because they never held out together.

Going back to the original point: Signing a 2006 tax return
in 2007, does not make you married in 2006.

>> Being shacked-up long-term in a common-law state also does
>> not necessarily make one married. You must have acted in a
>> manner consistent with being married and have witnesses to
>> your past actions.

> Exactly. There is also no common law divorce. That is to
> say that if you become married under the common law, you
> can't get divorced merely by moving out.

Ah, but! Marriages performed by a Bell Captain terminate
when you check out of the hotel.

Dick

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Posted by Stuart A. Bronstein on February 14, 2007, 9:42 pm
Please log in for more thread options

>> The courts there have mostly written out the final
>> requirement, saying that if the couple hold themselves out
>> as married (to someone, it need not be to everyone) that is
>> evidence of their present intent to be married, and all the
>> evidence required.

> Holding out is the equivalent of 'present intent', but it's
> a matter of both parties holding out in the same time frame.
> Signing a joint return would be 'holding out' in 2007. But
> they would need witnesses for a 2006 'holding out'.

Excellent point. I hadn't thought of that.

> Going back to the original point: Signing a 2006 tax return
> in 2007, does not make you married in 2006.

Yes, yes, I agree with that.

>> Exactly. There is also no common law divorce. That is to
>> say that if you become married under the common law, you
>> can't get divorced merely by moving out.

> Ah, but! Marriages performed by a Bell Captain terminate
> when you check out of the hotel.

Now that you mention it, that does ring a bell.

Stu

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Similar ThreadsPosted
my mother's unexpected MA tax refund June 14, 2006, 1:42 am
Is it possible to deduct my son's disability? November 18, 2006, 11:48 pm
Does a copy of other state return serve as a proof for Virginia tax return ? April 9, 2008, 5:42 pm
Filing status different for Federal return and State return April 11, 2007, 11:47 pm
can i claim my gf? February 5, 2007, 1:12 am
can he claim? February 8, 2007, 7:58 am
Claim settlement ? ? ? November 14, 2007, 1:39 pm
Stimulus claim April 5, 2008, 4:45 pm
How claim phone tax credit? January 30, 2007, 11:31 am
Regarding whether or not my father can claim me as a dependent. March 4, 2007, 9:09 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap