Home Page link  

Depreciation

 

Taxes General Forum - Tax professionals meeting place and answers to queries. (Moderated)

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Depreciation zl1515 03-25-2008
Posted by zl1515 on March 25, 2008, 9:43 pm
Please log in for more thread options
This is the scenario
Rental Property-Purchased thru a Partnership in 2003.
I held 51% interest in the Partnership.
On 12-31-07 I bought my partner's 49% and placed it in the name of my
Revocable Living Trust in order to avoid changing the deed from the
Partnership name.
The IRS no longer recognizes it as a Partnership (since my RLT and I
are the same tax entity).

Question:
Is it acceptable to depreciate the first half as usual and the newly
purchased half according to the new basis?
I understand that normally buying out a portion of a Partnership would
not alter the basis of the Real Estate the Partnership owns. However,
this is the only asset of the Partnership and if the IRS will not
recognize it as a Partnership anyway...wouldn't that make it acceptable
to figure it with the new basis?

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by Paul Thomas on March 25, 2008, 10:11 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> This is the scenario
> Rental Property-Purchased thru a Partnership in 2003.
> I held 51% interest in the Partnership.
> On 12-31-07 I bought my partner's 49% and placed it in the name of my
> Revocable Living Trust in order to avoid changing the deed from the
> Partnership name.
> The IRS no longer recognizes it as a Partnership (since my RLT and I
> are the same tax entity).
>
> Question:
> Is it acceptable to depreciate the first half as usual and the newly
> purchased half according to the new basis?

Since the building didn't change hands........no.


> I understand that normally buying out a portion of a Partnership would
> not alter the basis of the Real Estate the Partnership owns. However,



Looks like you have your answer.

Any new owner/partner buying in at any amount would not change the basis in
the asset.



> this is the only asset of the Partnership


And that asset - the building - isn't what you bought.




--
Paul A. Thomas, CPA
Athens, Georgia

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by Gil Faver on March 26, 2008, 7:05 am
Please log in for more thread options

>
>> This is the scenario
>> Rental Property-Purchased thru a Partnership in 2003.
>> I held 51% interest in the Partnership.
>> On 12-31-07 I bought my partner's 49% and placed it in the name of my
>> Revocable Living Trust in order to avoid changing the deed from the
>> Partnership name.
>> The IRS no longer recognizes it as a Partnership (since my RLT and I
>> are the same tax entity).
>>
>> Question:
>> Is it acceptable to depreciate the first half as usual and the newly
>> purchased half according to the new basis?
>
> Since the building didn't change hands........no.
>
>
>> I understand that normally buying out a portion of a Partnership would
>> not alter the basis of the Real Estate the Partnership owns. However,
>
>
>
> Looks like you have your answer.
>
> Any new owner/partner buying in at any amount would not change the basis
> in the asset.
>
>
>
>> this is the only asset of the Partnership
>
>
> And that asset - the building - isn't what you bought.

Thanks - this clears up for me what the OP was doing (I think). So, if this
was me, I would want to get rid of the "partnership with self", and hold the
property itself in my living trust. What are the tax issues here?

And, what was the purpose for not doing this in the first place? A savings
in property taxes?

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by zl1515 on March 27, 2008, 12:02 am
Please log in for more thread options
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >> This is the scenario
> >> Rental Property-Purchased thru a Partnership in 2003.
> >> I held 51% interest in the Partnership.
> >> On 12-31-07 I bought my partner's 49% and placed it in the name of my
> >> Revocable Living Trust in order to avoid changing the deed from the
> >> Partnership name.
> >> The IRS no longer recognizes it as a Partnership (since my RLT and I
> >> are the same tax entity).
>
> >> Question:
> >> Is it acceptable to depreciate the first half as usual and the newly
> >> purchased half according to the new basis?
>
> > Since the building didn't change hands........no.
>
> >> I understand that normally buying out a portion of a Partnership would
> >> not alter the basis of the Real Estate the Partnership owns. However,
>
> > Looks like you have your answer.
>
> > Any new owner/partner buying in at any amount would not change the basis
> > in the asset.
>
> >> this is the only asset of the Partnership
>
> > And that asset - the building - isn't what you bought.
>
> Thanks - this clears up for me what the OP was doing (I think). So, if this
> was me, I would want to get rid of the "partnership with self", and hold the
> property itself in my living trust. What are the tax issues here?
>
> And, what was the purpose for not doing this in the first place? A savings
> in property taxes?
>
> --
> << ------------------------------------------------------- >>
> << The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
> << nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
> << that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
> << >>
> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
> << to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
> << are atwww.asktax.org. >>
> << Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
> << ------------------------------------------------------- >>

I did not keep the partnership for tax purposes. I kept it for privacy
purposes....makes it harder for a tenant to find where I actually live
(they are low income apartments..I have had problems before).

========================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT:
- please trim the post to which you are responding

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Similar ThreadsPosted
Depreciation for the IRS March 30, 2007, 3:37 am
accelerated depreciation February 17, 2007, 4:58 am
Computer Depreciation March 7, 2007, 4:30 am
Depreciation Allowance March 10, 2007, 2:30 am
Schedule C Depreciation March 19, 2007, 11:12 am
Required Depreciation? ? ? April 9, 2007, 3:29 am
Unclaimed Depreciation April 9, 2007, 3:29 am
Depreciation Disagreement June 3, 2007, 10:29 pm
Depreciation Question March 8, 2008, 2:34 am
Depreciation of Herding Dog March 18, 2008, 5:32 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap