|
Posted by Bill on October 13, 2008, 3:00 pm
Please log in for more thread options
paulthomascpapc@bellsouth.net (Paul Thomas, CPA) posted:
>wrote
>>(In a sense, it can be seen as professional
>>courtesy: i.e., the IRS doesn't want to seem
>>to be "poaching" by suggesting you could
>>have a direct relationship with them, since
>>you have already demonstrated you have a
>>business arrangement with someone else --
>>and especially since that someone is
>>generally acting as an _agent_ in support of
>>the IRS.)
>Wait a minute. I surely don't consider myself
>"an _agent_ in support of the IRS".
>I am an advocate for my client, within the
>boundaries of the law. My client pays me, not
>the IRS. My client expects me to do what's
>right by them, meaning that they expect me to
>keep their tax bill as low as possible given the
>law and the information they provide to me.
Indeed, I agree as to your function and your allegiance. But (and maybe
I should have added this) _in the mind of the IRS_, you are "generally"
acting as an _agent_, since you assist taxpayers in complying with
filing requirements.
FWIW, I'm a volunteer preparer with TaxAide, and I certainly feel my
commitment is to assist the folks who come to me for help, but I also
know the IRS considers all TaxAide people as "instruments of their
purpose" to ensure full and faithful compliance with their regulations.
I know that, because IRS instructors have stated as much. That's why
they support us with training and materials.
Bill
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|