Home Page link  

How come the IRC doesn't make any sense...?

 

Taxes General Forum - Tax professionals meeting place and answers to queries. (Moderated)

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
How come the IRC doesn't make any sense...? LoTax 04-06-2008
Posted by LoTax on April 6, 2008, 12:20 pm
Please log in for more thread options
How come the IRC doesn't make any sense?

Here's what I'm chewing on: There's a code section that provides a
credit for a taxpayer's income tax withheld from salary, wages, and
some other things. I think - can't look right now - that it's IRC
section 31. Or at least near there, along with other "refundable
credits.".

How come there's no corresponding section that allows a credit for
estimated taxes paid by the taxpayer?

Is this a stupid question, or am I a monkey's uncle? Don't answer
that question, just answer the question about the IRC...

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by Phil Marti on April 6, 2008, 1:07 pm
Please log in for more thread options
"LoTax" wrote:

> Here's what I'm chewing on: There's a code section that provides a
> credit for a taxpayer's income tax withheld from salary, wages, and
> some other things. I think - can't look right now - that it's IRC
> section 31. Or at least near there, along with other "refundable
> credits.".
>
> How come there's no corresponding section that allows a credit for
> estimated taxes paid by the taxpayer?

Because, unlike withholding, ES payment are direct payments by the taxpayer
and are treated as payments, not a credit, on the return.

Overpayments are defined in section 6401, IIRC. I don't know that there is
a general definition of "payment" in the Code, but if there is it's probably
lurking down in the neighborhood of general definitions (7701?).

--
Phil Marti
Clarksburg, MD

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Similar ThreadsPosted
Can a one-man C-corp make sense? September 25, 2007, 11:40 pm
Added additional W-2 and refund dropped significantly. Does this make sense? February 19, 2008, 9:41 pm
Does my dad in nursing home need to file taxes? If so does it make sense that he owes? April 6, 2008, 12:26 pm
Casualty ins. proceeds if you don't make repairs? March 10, 2007, 2:11 am
Can I make just state estimated tax payments? May 30, 2008, 11:58 pm
Big capital loss and make company inactive? September 12, 2007, 10:05 pm
Reform a Credit Shelter Trust to make it a Grantor Trust? November 19, 2007, 6:10 pm
can i make roth contribution after i made sep contribution? TIA January 18, 2007, 3:22 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap