|
Posted by Dick Adams on October 7, 2009, 5:06 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>>> I sold my business and some of the proceeds were put into an
>>> escrow account to be available to the purchaser for legal fees
>>> in a pending lawsuit against the business; ie, the lawsuit is my
>>> problem, not theirs. The funds are held by an investment
>>> manager and invested in equities. I pay income tax on the
>>> income and get it at the end, if there is any money left in the
>>> escrow account at the end.
>>>
>>> My lawyer and accountant both say there is imputed interest on
>>> the escrow account because there is ALWAYS imputed interest on
>>> an escrow account when no actual interest is paid by the buyer
>>> to the seller.
>> Except for a couple of things. First, the money is yours. It's
>> not a loan. If you put your own money in an escrow account for
>> yourself, there is no imputed interest. There is no tax effect of
>> paying money to yourself.
>>
>> Second, there is actual interest that you are paying tax on. So no
>> additional interest is necessary.
The escrow account is his money. So the investment income and the
actual interest are his income. Unless he is on an accrual basis,
imputed interest is straw man. So, as usual, I agree with Stu.
>>> When I posted before several people here told me that I was
>>> getting a fair market return on my money, and that was
>>> equivalent to, so there was no imputed interest. The buyer
>>> wasn't getting anything on the money, so why would he pay
>>> interest?
>> Exactly.
>>> My lawyer and accountant say that makes good sense, but good
>>> sense doesn't matter. There is ALWAYS imputed interest on an
>>> escrow account regardless of whether is it sensible or not; they
>>> have never heard of an exception.
>> There may be some facts we're not aware of. But based on the story
>> you've told, your lawyer and accountant are just wrong.
> But can you cite a code or a case where an escrow account didn't pay
> either imputed interest or actual interest? They acknowledge this
> should be an exception, but can't see the IRS treating it as such
> since there are NO exceptions.
The geneal rule is "cash basis taxpayers do not pay imputed anything".
The major exception to my limited knowledge is Zero Coupon Bonds.
Are you a cash basis taxpayer? That's a very important question
because the rules are different for accrual basis taxpayers.
Dick
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|