|
Posted by D. Stussy on July 2, 2008, 3:02 am
Please log in for more thread options > aallflaat@gmail.com wrote:
> > I am writing both out of personal concern and to provide some
> > important
> > information to those who might inherit an annuity.
>
> You have no question.
I agree, but perhaps a concensus of correctness is being sought.
> > Sadly my mother passed away last year, intestate. There was
> > an variable annuity which she had not yet drawn upon. It had no
> > beneficiary.
>
> Each account application form should require an entry for beneficiary.
That doesn't mean that one was stated, or that the estate wasn't selected as
the named beneficiary (which is a stupid choice if one does have an heir).
> > [...] In my case, I will simply increase my
> > tax
> > deferred savings through my employer by an amount equal to the RMD so
> > it
> > does not change my tax bill at all.
> >
>
> Unless adding the RMD amount causes you to exceed your allowed
contribution.
I don't see that as happening since RMDs can't be rolled over. Only non-RMD
amounts could be, but note that aggregating an inherited amount with
non-inherited amounts loses the inherited character.
> > Thus, the fact that my mother chose not to designate a beneficiary
> > should
> > not affect the ability of those inheriting the annuity from doing so.
>
> You are trying to designate a beneficiary?
I don't see that. The law has already selected a beneficiary for you.
> Most of your post, I could not make it through.
I can't figure what's going on either - for certain.
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|