|
Posted by Stuart A. Bronstein on October 2, 2009, 1:18 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> "Stuart A. Bronstein" wrote:
>
>> I suppose it depends on whether the pain and suffering damages
>> are for those of the son or those of the parents.
>
> Actually, it does not. The parents suffered emotional pain and
> distress because of a physical injury which resulted in the
> death of their son. Therefore the payments to them are
> excludible.
I believe it has to be for your own personal injuries, not someone
else's.
> In Kevin M. O’Gilvie and Stephanie L. O’Gilvie, minors,
> Petitioners v. United States [96-2 USTC ¶50,664; 117 SCt 452]
> the Supremes make clear that the only reason settlement payments
> received by a decedent's minor children were not excludible is
> the payments were punitive damages. If the payments to the
> children had not been punitive damages, then those payments
> would have been excluded from taxation. The same reasoning
> applies to the OP's situation. The payments are excludible.
That case is inapplicable. First of all this specific issue was
never brought up in that case.
But more important, that case dealt with §104 as it read in 1988.
And then it excluded all damages resulting from personal injuries,
including emotional distress. So under the code as it read at that
time, the damages were excludible from income even if they were for
emotional distress.
--
Stu
http://downtoearthlawyer.com
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|